Literature DB >> 9746144

Anodally focused polarization of peripheral nerve allows discrimination of myelinated and unmyelinated fiber input to brainstem nuclei.

J C Petruska1, C H Hubscher, R D Johnson.   

Abstract

We investigated the ability of a novel direct current (DC) polarization technique to block selectively the conduction in peripheral myelinated nerve fibers and allowing propagation in only unmyelinated fibers. In anesthetized adult rats, distal branches of the sciatic nerve (caudal cutaneous sural and tibial nerves) were exposed for electrical stimulation of A- and C-fibers. Two specially fabricated trough electrodes of different size and surface area were placed onto the sciatic nerve. Through these proximal electrodes a controlled ramped DC was timed to coincide with the arrival of A- and C-fiber action potentials, evoked electrically at the distal nerves or naturally from the foot or ankle, with the intent of blocking propagation in A-fibers while allowing C-fiber throughput. Neuronal recordings were made both peripherally (proximal sciatic nerve fascicles or L5 dorsal roots) and centrally (single cells in the nucleus gracilis or nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis). The DC polarization was shown to block conduction in myelinated A-fibers effectively, while allowing conduction in the unmyelinated C-fibers, without activation of fibers via the DC polarization itself. This was dependent upon the following factors: electrode polarity, onset rate of polarization, peak amplitude of polarization, distance between polarizing electrodes, size difference between polarizing electrodes, and gross nerve size. These experiments demonstrate that anodally focused DC polarization, applied utilizing two trough electrodes of different sizes, is capable of effectively, reversibly, and reproducibly blocking conduction in myelinated A-fibers evoked either electrically or naturally, while still allowing conduction to occur in the unmyelinated C-fiber population. In the context of experimental usage, we have demonstrated blocking of low-threshold A-fiber, but not C-fiber, mediated inputs to the caudal brainstem. This technique should find wide application in studies involving the processing of information conveyed centrally by the unmyelinated C-fiber afferent population, including discriminating afferent responses to peripheral stimuli, the role of C-fiber input in reflex activity, and the plasticity following injury or other manipulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9746144     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  14 in total

1.  Break excitation alone does not explain the delay and amplitude of anodal current-induced vasodilatation in human skin.

Authors:  S Durand; B Fromy; A Humeau; D Sigaudo-Roussel; J L Saumet; P Abraham
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Nerve conduction block utilising high-frequency alternating current.

Authors:  K L Kilgore; N Bhadra
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Conduction block of whole nerve without onset firing using combined high frequency and direct current.

Authors:  D Michael Ackermann; Niloy Bhadra; Emily L Foldes; Kevin L Kilgore
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Continuous Direct Current Nerve Block Using Multi Contact High Capacitance Electrodes.

Authors:  Tina Vrabec; Niloy Bhadra; Gustaf Van Acker; Narendra Bhadra; Kevin Kilgore
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Effect of nerve cuff electrode geometry on onset response firing in high-frequency nerve conduction block.

Authors:  D Michael Ackermann; Niloy Bhadra; Emily L Foldes; Xiao-Feng Wang; Kevin L Kilgore
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Characterization of high capacitance electrodes for the application of direct current electrical nerve block.

Authors:  Tina Vrabec; Niloy Bhadra; Jesse Wainright; Narendra Bhadra; Manfred Franke; Kevin Kilgore
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  High-frequency stimulation selectively blocks different types of fibers in frog sciatic nerve.

Authors:  Laveeta Joseph; Robert J Butera
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  A Carbon Slurry Separated Interface Nerve Electrode for Electrical Block of Nerve Conduction.

Authors:  Tina L Vrabec; Jesse S Wainright; Narendra Bhadra; Laura Shaw; Kevin L Kilgore; Niloy Bhadra
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Analysis of nerve conduction block induced by direct current.

Authors:  Changfeng Tai; James R Roppolo; William C de Groat
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 10.  Reversible conduction block in peripheral nerve using electrical waveforms.

Authors:  Niloy Bhadra; Tina L Vrabec; Narendra Bhadra; Kevin L Kilgore
Journal:  Bioelectron Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.