Literature DB >> 12122152

Break excitation alone does not explain the delay and amplitude of anodal current-induced vasodilatation in human skin.

S Durand1, B Fromy, A Humeau, D Sigaudo-Roussel, J L Saumet, P Abraham.   

Abstract

In iontophoresis experiments, a 'non-specific' current-induced vasodilatation interferes with the effects of the diffused drugs. This current-induced vasodilatation is assumed to rely on an axon reflex due to excitation of cutaneous nociceptors and is weaker and delayed at the anode as compared to the cathode. We analysed whether these anodal specificities could result from a break excitation of nociceptors. Break excitation is the generation of action potentials at the end of a square anodal DC current application, which are generally weaker than those observed at the onset of a same application at the cathode. In eight healthy volunteers, we studied forearm cutaneous laser Doppler flow (LDF) responses to: (1) anodal and cathodal 100 microA current applications of 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 min; (2) 100 microA anodal applications of 3 min with a progressive ending over 100 s (total charge 23 mC); these were compared to square-ended 100 microA anodal applications of the same total charge (23 mC) or duration (3 min); (3) a 4 min 100 microA anodal application with a 333 msec break at half time. Results (mean +/- S.D.) are expressed as percentage of heat-induced maximal vasodilatation (%MVD). Onset (T(vd)) and amplitude (LDF(peak)) of vasodilatation were determined. We observed that: T(vd) was linearly related to the duration of current application at the anode (slope = 1.01, r(2) = 0.99, P < 0.0001) but not at the cathode (slope = 0.03, r(2) = 0.02, n.s.). Progressive ending of anodal current did not decrease LDF(peak) (63.3 +/- 24.6 %MVD) as compared to square-ending of current application of the same duration (36.9 +/- 22.2 %MVD) or the same total charge (57.1 +/- 23.5 %MVD). A transient break of anodal current did not allow for the vasodilatation to develop until current was permanently stopped. We conclude that, during iontophoresis, anodal break excitation alone cannot account for the delay and amplitude of the vascular response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12122152      PMCID: PMC2290427          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.022731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  40 in total

1.  New feelings about the role of sensory nerves in inflammation.

Authors:  S D Brain
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Mechanisms of make and break excitation revisited: paradoxical break excitation during diastolic stimulation.

Authors:  Vladimir P Nikolski; Aleksandre T Sambelashvili; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Skin pH changes associated with iontophoresis.

Authors:  J S Guffey; M J Rutherford; W Payne; C Phillips
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Laser Doppler measurements of skin vasodilation elicited by percutaneous electrical stimulation of nociceptors in humans.

Authors:  W Magerl; J Szolcsányi; R A Westerman; H O Handwerker
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1987-12-04       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Anodal block of medullated cardiopulmonary vagal afferents in cats.

Authors:  P Thorén; J T Shepherd; D E Donald
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1977-03

6.  Selective Activation of peripheral nerve fibre groups of different diameter by triangular shaped stimulus pulses.

Authors:  N Accornero; G Bini; G L Lenzi; M Manfredi
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Nonspecific microvascular vasodilation during iontophoresis is attenuated by application of hyperosmolar saline.

Authors:  A Asberg; T Holm; T Vassbotn; A K Andreassen; A Hartmann
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.514

8.  Depolarization changes the mechanism of accommodation in rat and human motor axons.

Authors:  M Baker; H Bostock
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Vasodilatation in response to repeated anodal current application in the human skin relies on aspirin-sensitive mechanisms.

Authors:  S Durand; B Fromy; Ph Bouyé; J L Saumet; P Abraham
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Effect of anodal blockade of myelinated fibers on vagal C-fiber afferents.

Authors:  F A Hopp; E J Zuperku; R L Coon; J P Kampine
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1980-11
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Timothy A Wagner; Pedro C Miranda; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Sarah H Lisanby; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Oral single high-dose aspirin results in a long-lived inhibition of anodal current-induced vasodilatation.

Authors:  S Durand; B Fromy; A Koïtka; M Tartas; J L Saumet; P Abraham
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.739

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.