Literature DB >> 9737141

Patients' experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health-related quality of life.

J Buxton1, M White, D Osoba.   

Abstract

This study assessed patients' experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor (TSVM) for the assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). A software program was developed for a computerized form of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, the QLQ-C30. One hundred and seventy-eight patients completed the QLQ-C30, followed by a structured interview designed to assess perceived difficulties with the use of the TSVM. Patients were asked to evaluate the ease of use of different aspects of the TSVM system (using the touch-sensitive screen, entering the patient identification number, reading the screen and following the on-screen instructions). The majority of patients found all aspects of the TSVM system 'very easy' to use. A few patients (1-2%) admitted finding any aspect of the TSVM use 'somewhat difficult' and none ranked any aspect as 'very difficult'. There were no unanswered items in the QLQ-C30. All patients found the amount of time spent on answering the questionnaire acceptable, (the mean time to complete was 6.8 min with a median of 5 min) and 96% stated they were willing to complete a similar questionnaire on a future occasion. From the patients' perspective the TSVM system appears to be a highly acceptable approach for the collection of HRQoL data in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9737141     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008826408328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  5 in total

1.  The EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30): validity and reliability when analysed with patients treated with palliative radiotherapy.

Authors:  S Kaasa; K Bjordal; N Aaronson; T Moum; E Wist; S Hagen; A Kvikstad
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  The Swedish Health-Related Quality of Life Survey (SWED-QUAL).

Authors:  B Brorsson; J Ifver; R D Hays
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the EORTC quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in patients with breast, ovarian and lung cancer.

Authors:  D Osoba; B Zee; J Pater; D Warr; L Kaizer; J Latreille
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Measurement of health-related quality of life in multiple myeloma. Nordic Myeloma Study Group.

Authors:  F Wisløff; S Eika; E Hippe; M Hjorth; E Holmberg; S Kaasa; I Palva; J Westin
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.998

  5 in total
  30 in total

1.  Oncologists' use of quality of life information: results of a survey of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group physicians.

Authors:  A Bezjak; P Ng; R Skeel; A D Depetrillo; R Comis; K M Taylor
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Dynamic assessment of health outcomes: time to let the CAT out of the bag?

Authors:  Karon F Cook; Kimberly J O'Malley; Toni S Roddey
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Preconsult interactive computer-assisted client assessment survey for common mental disorders in a community health centre: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Farah Ahmad; Wendy Lou; Yogendra Shakya; Liane Ginsburg; Peggy T Ng; Meb Rashid; Serban Dinca-Panaitescu; Cliff Ledwos; Kwame McKenzie
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-03-01

4.  Taking PROs and patient-centered care seriously: incremental and disruptive ideas for incorporating PROs in oncology practice.

Authors:  Molla Sloane Donaldson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-11-09       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Testing the measurement equivalence of paper and touch-screen versions of the EQ-5D visual analog scale (EQ VAS).

Authors:  Sulabha Ramachandran; J Jason Lundy; Stephen Joel Coons
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  The role of technical advances in the adoption and integration of patient-reported outcomes in clinical care.

Authors:  Roxanne E Jensen; Nan E Rothrock; Esi M DeWitt; Brennan Spiegel; Carole A Tucker; Heidi M Crane; Christopher B Forrest; Donald L Patrick; Rob Fredericksen; Lisa M Shulman; David Cella; Paul K Crane
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Rapid assessment of psychosocial well-being: are computers the way forward in a clinical setting?

Authors:  Allison Boyes; Sallie Newell; Afaf Girgis
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Outcome scores collected by touchscreen: medical audit as it should be in the 21st century?

Authors:  Sean Dixon; Timothy Bunker; Daniel Chan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Validation and patient acceptance of a computer touch screen version of the WOMAC 3.1 osteoarthritis index.

Authors:  H A Bischoff-Ferrari; M Vondechend; N Bellamy; R Theiler
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Logistic feasibility of health related quality of life measurement in clinical practice: results of a prospective study in a large population of chronic liver patients.

Authors:  Jolie J Gutteling; Jan J V Busschbach; Robert A de Man; Anne-Sophie E Darlington
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.