Literature DB >> 7841968

Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the EORTC quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in patients with breast, ovarian and lung cancer.

D Osoba1, B Zee, J Pater, D Warr, L Kaizer, J Latreille.   

Abstract

The QLQ-C30, a health-related quality of life questionnaire developed for use in patients with cancer, has been previously validated in patients with lung cancer and head and neck cancer. In this study, further validation was carried out for 535 patients, including patients with breast cancer (n = 143) and ovarian cancer (n = 111) for whom there is no previously published validation, as well as patients with lung cancer (n = 160) and a heterogeneous group of other cancers (n = 121). All patients were entered in one of two trials of anti-emetics to prevent chemotherapy-induced emesis. The QLQ-C30 was completed before chemotherapy and on day 8 after chemotherapy. The factor structure in patients with breast and ovarian cancer was similar to that previously described. Interdomain correlations, in the entire group, were strongest for the physical and role function domains and the fatigue, pain and global quality of life domains before and after chemotherapy. In addition, after chemotherapy, social function was also strongly correlated with fatigue and global quality of life. These correlations were not always of equal strength in the breast, ovarian and lung groups, suggesting that there may be differences between these groups. The responsiveness of the QLQ-C30 in the presence of widely metastatic, as compared with locoregional, disease showed changes in the expected directions (i.e., diminished function in physical and social role functions and in global quality of life, with greater fatigue and pain in patients with metastatic disease). Eight days after chemotherapy, decreases were seen in physical, role and social functioning and in global quality of life, and there was greater fatigue, nausea and vomiting compared with before chemotherapy. Patients with breast cancer had better physical, role and social functioning and less fatigue and pain than patients with ovarian cancer. This result is expected, since many of the patients with breast cancer had early stage disease, whereas those with ovarian cancer had advanced stage disease. Mean scores for patients with lung cancer were between the other two groups, in keeping with the mixture of early and advanced stage disease in these patients. There was a strong correlation between ECOG performance status scores and several domains of the QLQ-C30; these were all in the expected directions. The results of this study confirm those in earlier studies on patients with lung cancer, and provide new information on patients with breast and ovarian cancer. In addition, the QLQ-C30 is responsive to the effects of chemotherapy and of metastatic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7841968     DOI: 10.1007/bf00451727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  6 in total

1.  Psychometric validation of the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire, 30-item version and a diagnosis-specific module for head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  K Bjordal; S Kaasa
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.089

2.  Effect of schedule and maintenance on the antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron combined with dexamethasone in acute and delayed nausea and emesis in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a phase III trial by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

Authors:  L Kaizer; D Warr; P Hoskins; J Latreille; W Lofters; J Yau; M Palmer; B Zee; M Levy; J Pater
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Quality of life during chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer. II. A longitudinal study of the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire and comparison with the Sickness Impact Profile.

Authors:  B Bergman; M Sullivan; S Sörenson
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.089

5.  A validation study of the domains of the core EORTC quality of life questionnaire.

Authors:  H E Niezgoda; J L Pater
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Testing the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire on cancer patients with heterogeneous diagnoses.

Authors:  G I Ringdal; K Ringdal
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.147

  6 in total
  112 in total

Review 1.  Measuring the effect of cancer on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  D Osoba
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The impact of individual quality of life assessment on psychosocial attention in patients with chest malignancies: a randomized study.

Authors:  Mercedes Nicklasson; Magnus L Elfström; Jan Olofson; Bengt Bergman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Effect of neurological dysfunction on health-related quality of life in patients with high-grade glioma.

Authors:  D Osoba; N K Aaronson; M Muller; K Sneeuw; M A Hsu; W K Yung; M Brada; E Newlands
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Population-based study of the relationship of treatment and sociodemographics on quality of life for early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Nancy K Janz; Mahasin Mujahid; Paula M Lantz; Angela Fagerlin; Barbara Salem; Monica Morrow; Dennis Deapen; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Anxiety, depression and quality of life in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Akira Tsunoda; Kentaro Nakao; Kenshi Hiratsuka; Naokuni Yasuda; Miki Shibusawa; Mitsuo Kusano
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): validation study of the Thai version.

Authors:  Chatchawan Silpakit; Suwanee Sirilerttrakul; Manmana Jirajarus; Thitiya Sirisinha; Ekaphop Sirachainan; Vorachai Ratanatharathorn
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Multidimensional constructs of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-c30) in Korean cancer patients with heterogeneous diagnoses.

Authors:  Eun-Hyun Lee; Mison Chun; Hee-Jung Wang; Ho Yeong Lim; Jin-Hyuk Choi
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 4.679

8.  Acupuncture for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Weidong Lu; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Rachel A Freedman; Im Hee Shin; Nancy U Lin; Ann H Partridge; David S Rosenthal; Jennifer A Ligibel
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-10-14

9.  Development and validation of an instrument to measure the effects of a mistletoe preparation on quality of life of cancer patients: the Life Quality Lectin-53 (LQL-53) Questionnaire.

Authors:  Inge Kirchberger; Dieter Wetzel; Thomas Finger
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Validity, reliability and clinical relevance of EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13 in patients with chest malignancies in a palliative setting.

Authors:  Mercedes Nicklasson; Bengt Bergman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.