Literature DB >> 9730918

A single amino-acid substitution in the EP2 prostaglandin receptor confers responsiveness to prostacyclin analogs.

K M Kedzie1, J E Donello, H A Krauss, J W Regan, D W Gil.   

Abstract

A high degree of homology between the four Gs-coupled prostaglandin (PG) receptors [EP2, EP4, prostacyclin (IP), PGD2 (DP)] and the four Gq/Gi-coupled receptors [EP1, EP3, PGF2alpha (FP), thromboxane A2 (TP)] suggests that prostaglandin receptors evolved functionally from an ancestral EP receptor before the development of distinct binding epitopes. If so, ligand selectivity should be determined by a limited number of amino acids. EP2 receptor transmembrane domain residues that are similar to those in the EP4 receptor but differ from those in the IP receptor were mutated to the corresponding IP receptor residue. Activation of the mutant receptors by PGE2 (EP2 ligand), iloprost (stable prostacyclin analog), and PGE1 (EP2/IP ligand) was determined using a cAMP-dependent reporter gene assay. A Leu304-to-tyrosine substitution in the seventh transmembrane domain enhanced iloprost potency approximately 100-fold. A glycine substitution at Ser120 in the third transmembrane domain had no effect on drug potency but improved the response of the Tyr304 mutant. The potency of the natural prostaglandins PGF2alpha and PGD2 was not enhanced by the mutations. In contrast, the potency of all prostaglandins was reduced 10- to 100-fold when arginine 302, which is thought to be a counterion for the prostaglandin carboxylic acid, was mutated. Thus, a single amino acid change resulted in a selective gain of function for iloprost, which is consistent with the proposed phylogeny of the prostaglandin receptors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9730918     DOI: 10.1124/mol.54.3.584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  7 in total

1.  Prediction of the 3D structure and dynamics of human DP G-protein coupled receptor bound to an agonist and an antagonist.

Authors:  Youyong Li; Fangqiang Zhu; Nagarajan Vaidehi; William A Goddard; Felix Sheinerman; Stephan Reiling; Isabelle Morize; Lan Mu; Keith Harris; Ali Ardati; Abdelazize Laoui
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  A structural chemogenomics analysis of aminergic GPCRs: lessons for histamine receptor ligand design.

Authors:  A J Kooistra; S Kuhne; I J P de Esch; R Leurs; C de Graaf
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Identification by site-directed mutagenesis of amino acids contributing to ligand-binding specificity or signal transduction properties of the human FP prostanoid receptor.

Authors:  Frank Neuschäfer-Rube; Eva Engemaier; Sina Koch; Ulrike Böer; Gerhard P Püschel
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  New insights into human prostacyclin receptor structure and function through natural and synthetic mutations of transmembrane charged residues.

Authors:  J Stitham; E Arehart; S R Gleim; N Li; K Douville; J Hwa
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  Molecular mechanisms of target recognition by lipid GPCRs: relevance for cancer.

Authors:  M T M van Jaarsveld; J M Houthuijzen; E E Voest
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Prediction of the Human EP1 Receptor Binding Site by Homology Modeling and Molecular Dynamics Simulation.

Authors:  Behnoush Zare; Armin Madadkar-Sobhani; Siavoush Dastmalchi; Masoud Mahmoudian
Journal:  Sci Pharm       Date:  2011-08-07

7.  Mapping the Molecular Architecture Required for Lipid-Binding Pockets Using a Subset of Established and Orphan G-Protein Coupled Receptors.

Authors:  Shanthi Nagarajan; Zu Yuan Qian; Parthiban Marimuthu; Nabil J Alkayed; Sanjiv Kaul; Anthony P Barnes
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 6.162

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.