BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chemogenomics focuses on the discovery of new connections between chemical and biological space leading to the discovery of new protein targets and biologically active molecules. G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a particularly interesting protein family for chemogenomics studies because there is an overwhelming amount of ligand binding affinity data available. The increasing number of aminergic GPCR crystal structures now for the first time allows the integration of chemogenomics studies with high-resolution structural analyses of GPCR-ligand complexes. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: In this study, we have combined ligand affinity data, receptor mutagenesis studies, and amino acid sequence analyses to high-resolution structural analyses of (hist)aminergic GPCR-ligand interactions. This integrated structural chemogenomics analysis is used to more accurately describe the molecular and structural determinants of ligand affinity and selectivity in different key binding regions of the crystallized aminergic GPCRs, and histamine receptors in particular. KEY RESULTS: Our investigations highlight interesting correlations and differences between ligand similarity and ligand binding site similarity of different aminergic receptors. Apparent discrepancies can be explained by combining detailed analysis of crystallized or predicted protein-ligand binding modes, receptor mutation studies, and ligand structure-selectivity relationships that identify local differences in essential pharmacophore features in the ligand binding sites of different receptors. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: We have performed structural chemogenomics studies that identify links between (hist)aminergic receptor ligands and their binding sites and binding modes. This knowledge can be used to identify structure-selectivity relationships that increase our understanding of ligand binding to (hist)aminergic receptors and hence can be used in future GPCR ligand discovery and design.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chemogenomics focuses on the discovery of new connections between chemical and biological space leading to the discovery of new protein targets and biologically active molecules. G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a particularly interesting protein family for chemogenomics studies because there is an overwhelming amount of ligand binding affinity data available. The increasing number of aminergic GPCR crystal structures now for the first time allows the integration of chemogenomics studies with high-resolution structural analyses of GPCR-ligand complexes. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: In this study, we have combined ligand affinity data, receptor mutagenesis studies, and amino acid sequence analyses to high-resolution structural analyses of (hist)aminergic GPCR-ligand interactions. This integrated structural chemogenomics analysis is used to more accurately describe the molecular and structural determinants of ligand affinity and selectivity in different key binding regions of the crystallized aminergic GPCRs, and histamine receptors in particular. KEY RESULTS: Our investigations highlight interesting correlations and differences between ligand similarity and ligand binding site similarity of different aminergic receptors. Apparent discrepancies can be explained by combining detailed analysis of crystallized or predicted protein-ligand binding modes, receptor mutation studies, and ligand structure-selectivity relationships that identify local differences in essential pharmacophore features in the ligand binding sites of different receptors. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: We have performed structural chemogenomics studies that identify links between (hist)aminergic receptor ligands and their binding sites and binding modes. This knowledge can be used to identify structure-selectivity relationships that increase our understanding of ligand binding to (hist)aminergic receptors and hence can be used in future GPCR ligand discovery and design.
Authors: Panayiotis A Procopiou; Christopher Browning; Jennifer M Buckley; Kenneth L Clark; Lise Fechner; Paul M Gore; Ashley P Hancock; Simon T Hodgson; Duncan S Holmes; Michael Kranz; Brian E Looker; Karen M L Morriss; Daniel L Parton; Linda J Russell; Robert J Slack; Steven L Sollis; Sadie Vile; Clarissa J Watts Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2011-03-07 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Ron O Dror; Albert C Pan; Daniel H Arlow; David W Borhani; Paul Maragakis; Yibing Shan; Huafeng Xu; David E Shaw Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-07-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Maikel Wijtmans; Chris de Graaf; Gerdien de Kloe; Enade P Istyastono; Judith Smit; Herman Lim; Ratchanok Boonnak; Saskia Nijmeijer; Rogier A Smits; Aldo Jongejan; Obbe Zuiderveld; Iwan J P de Esch; Rob Leurs Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Søren G F Rasmussen; Hee-Jung Choi; Juan Jose Fung; Els Pardon; Paola Casarosa; Pil Seok Chae; Brian T Devree; Daniel M Rosenbaum; Foon Sun Thian; Tong Sun Kobilka; Andreas Schnapp; Ingo Konetzki; Roger K Sunahara; Samuel H Gellman; Alexander Pautsch; Jan Steyaert; William I Weis; Brian K Kobilka Journal: Nature Date: 2011-01-13 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Tony Warne; Rouslan Moukhametzianov; Jillian G Baker; Rony Nehmé; Patricia C Edwards; Andrew G W Leslie; Gebhard F X Schertler; Christopher G Tate Journal: Nature Date: 2011-01-13 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: D Wifling; K Löffel; U Nordemann; A Strasser; G Bernhardt; S Dove; R Seifert; A Buschauer Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2014-09-05 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Pertti Panula; Paul L Chazot; Marlon Cowart; Ralf Gutzmer; Rob Leurs; Wai L S Liu; Holger Stark; Robin L Thurmond; Helmut L Haas Journal: Pharmacol Rev Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 25.468
Authors: Vignir Isberg; Chris de Graaf; Andrea Bortolato; Vadim Cherezov; Vsevolod Katritch; Fiona H Marshall; Stefan Mordalski; Jean-Philippe Pin; Raymond C Stevens; Gerrit Vriend; David E Gloriam Journal: Trends Pharmacol Sci Date: 2014-12-22 Impact factor: 14.819
Authors: Gerard Jp van Westen; Remco F Swier; Isidro Cortes-Ciriano; Jörg K Wegner; John P Overington; Adriaan P Ijzerman; Herman Wt van Vlijmen; Andreas Bender Journal: J Cheminform Date: 2013-09-24 Impact factor: 5.514
Authors: Albert J Kooistra; Henry F Vischer; Daniel McNaught-Flores; Rob Leurs; Iwan J P de Esch; Chris de Graaf Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 4.379