BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The human prostacyclin receptor (hIP), a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) expressed mainly on platelets and vascular smooth muscle cells, plays important protective roles in the cardiovascular system. We hypothesized that significant insights could be gained into the structure and function of the hIP through mutagenesis of its energetically unfavourably located transmembrane charged residues. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Within its putative transmembrane helices fourteen hydrophilic residues, both unique and conserved across GPCRs, were systematically mutated to assess for effects on receptor structure and function. KEY RESULTS: Mutations of ten of the fourteen charged residues to alanine exhibited defective binding and/or activation. Key potential interactions were identified between 6 core residues; E116(3.49)-R117(3.50) (salt bridge TMIII), D274(7.35)-R279(7.40) (salt bridge TMVII), and D60(2.50)-D288(7.49) (H-bond network TMII-TMVII). Further detailed investigation of E116(3.49) (TMIII) with mutation to a glutamine showed a 2.6-fold increase in agonist-independent basal activity. This increase in activity accounts for a proportion ( approximately 13%) of full agonist induced activation. We further characterized two novel naturally occurring human mutations, R77(2.33)C and R279(7.40)C recently identified in a 1455 human genomic DNA sample screen. The R77(2.33)C variant appeared to exclusively affect expression, while the R279(7.40)C variant, exhibited considerable deficiencies in both agonist binding and activation. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Transmembrane charged residues play important roles in maintaining the hIP binding pocket and ensuring normal activation. The critical nature of these charged residues and the presence of naturally occurring mutations have important implications in the rational design of prostacyclin agonists for treating cardiovascular disease.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The humanprostacyclin receptor (hIP), a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) expressed mainly on platelets and vascular smooth muscle cells, plays important protective roles in the cardiovascular system. We hypothesized that significant insights could be gained into the structure and function of the hIP through mutagenesis of its energetically unfavourably located transmembrane charged residues. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Within its putative transmembrane helices fourteen hydrophilic residues, both unique and conserved across GPCRs, were systematically mutated to assess for effects on receptor structure and function. KEY RESULTS: Mutations of ten of the fourteen charged residues to alanine exhibited defective binding and/or activation. Key potential interactions were identified between 6 core residues; E116(3.49)-R117(3.50) (salt bridge TMIII), D274(7.35)-R279(7.40) (salt bridge TMVII), and D60(2.50)-D288(7.49) (H-bond network TMII-TMVII). Further detailed investigation of E116(3.49) (TMIII) with mutation to a glutamine showed a 2.6-fold increase in agonist-independent basal activity. This increase in activity accounts for a proportion ( approximately 13%) of full agonist induced activation. We further characterized two novel naturally occurring human mutations, R77(2.33)C and R279(7.40)C recently identified in a 1455 human genomic DNA sample screen. The R77(2.33)C variant appeared to exclusively affect expression, while the R279(7.40)C variant, exhibited considerable deficiencies in both agonist binding and activation. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Transmembrane charged residues play important roles in maintaining the hIP binding pocket and ensuring normal activation. The critical nature of these charged residues and the presence of naturally occurring mutations have important implications in the rational design of prostacyclin agonists for treating cardiovascular disease.
Authors: Jong-Myoung Kim; Christian Altenbach; Masahiro Kono; Daniel D Oprian; Wayne L Hubbell; H Gobind Khorana Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-08-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jeremiah Stitham; Aleksandar Stojanovic; Lauren A Ross; Anthony C Blount; John Hwa Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2004-07-20 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Duane A Chung; Susan M Wade; Carol B Fowler; Danielle D Woods; Paolo B Abada; Henry I Mosberg; Richard R Neubig Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2002-05-17 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Forrest A Wright; Justine P Lu; Danielle A Sliter; Nicolas Dupré; Guy A Rouleau; Richard J H Wojcikiewicz Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Eric Arehart; Jeremiah Stitham; Folkert W Asselbergs; Karen Douville; Todd MacKenzie; Kristina M Fetalvero; Scott Gleim; Zsolt Kasza; Yamini Rao; Laurie Martel; Sharon Segel; John Robb; Aaron Kaplan; Michael Simons; Richard J Powell; Jason H Moore; Eric B Rimm; Kathleen A Martin; John Hwa Journal: Circ Res Date: 2008-03-06 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Sylwester P Rogula; Hubert M Mutwil; Aleksandra Gąsecka; Marcin Kurzyna; Krzysztof J Filipiak Journal: Cardiol J Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 2.737
Authors: Anke Bill; Elizabeth M Rosethorne; Toby C Kent; Lindsay Fawcett; Lynn Burchell; Michiel T van Diepen; Anthony Marelli; Sergey Batalov; Loren Miraglia; Anthony P Orth; Nicole A Renaud; Steven J Charlton; Martin Gosling; L Alex Gaither; Paul J Groot-Kormelink Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 3.240