Literature DB >> 9729903

Basing categorization on individuals and events.

L W Barsalou1, J Huttenlocher, K Lamberts.   

Abstract

Exemplar, prototype, and connectionist models typically assume that events constitute the basic unit of learning and representation in categorization. In these models, each learning events updates a statistical representation of a category independently of other learning events. An implication is that events involving the same individual affect learning independently and are not integrated into a single structure that represents the individual in an internal model of the world. A series of experiments demonstrates that human subjects track individuals across events, establish representations of them, and use these representations in categorization. These findings are consistent with "representationalism," the view that an internal model of the world constitutes a physical level of representation in the brain, and that the brain does not simply capture the statistical properties of events in an undifferentiated dynamical system. Although categorization is an inherently statistical process that produces generalization, pattern completion, frequency effects, and adaptive learning, it is also an inherently representational process that establishes an internal model of the world. As a result, representational structures evolve in memory to track the histories of individuals, accumulate information about them, and simulate them in events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9729903     DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

1.  What is learned in knowledge-related categories? Evidence from typicality and feature frequency judgments.

Authors:  T L Spalding; G L Murphy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-09

2.  Effects of similarity and practice on speeded classification response times and accuracies: further tests of an exemplar-retrieval model.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; L A Alfonso-Reese
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

3.  Does the order of head noun and modifier explain response times in conceptual combination?

Authors:  Gert Storms; Edward J Wisniewski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-07

4.  Character movement and the representation of space during narrative comprehension.

Authors:  David N Rapp; Jessica L Klug; Holly A Taylor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-09

Review 5.  Models in search of a brain.

Authors:  Bradley C Love; Todd M Gureckis
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Hippocampal activation during episodic and semantic memory retrieval: comparing category production and category cued recall.

Authors:  Lee Ryan; Christine Cox; Scott M Hayes; Lynn Nadel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 7.  Is there an exemplar theory of concepts?

Authors:  Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

8.  Causal learning about tolerance and sensitization.

Authors:  Benjamin Margolin Rottman; Woo-Kyoung Ahn
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12

9.  Prior knowledge and exemplar frequency.

Authors:  Harlan D Harris; Gregory L Murphy; Bob Rehder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-10

10.  Understanding variation in chronic disease outcomes.

Authors:  Paul E Johnson; Peter J Veazie; Laura Kochevar; Patrick J O'Connor; Sandra J Potthoff; Devesh Verma; Pradyumna Dutta
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2002-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.