Literature DB >> 16383173

Does the order of head noun and modifier explain response times in conceptual combination?

Gert Storms1, Edward J Wisniewski.   

Abstract

We describe a speeded sensibility judgment experiment in which noun-noun combinations in the Indonesian language were used that parallels Gagné and Shoben's (1997) study of combinations in the English language. Like English, Indonesian is read from left to right and contains noun-noun combinations that are formed by juxtaposing the nouns. However, unlike in English, the order of the modifier and the head noun is reversed. This difference between English and Indonesian combinations allowed us to assess whether sensibility judgments of combinations are affected primarily by the left-right order of the nouns or by different functional roles of the nouns (i.e., modifier vs. head noun). As in Gagné and Shoben's study, the modifier's relation frequency contributed significantly to predicting sensibility judgment times in a regression analysis, but the head noun's relation frequency did not. We discuss the implications of this finding for models of conceptual combination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16383173     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  10 in total

Review 1.  Perceptual symbol systems.

Authors:  L W Barsalou
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Interactive property attribution in concept combination.

Authors:  Z Estes; S Glucksberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-01

3.  What is learned in knowledge-related categories? Evidence from typicality and feature frequency judgments.

Authors:  T L Spalding; G L Murphy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-09

4.  Frequency of relation type as a determinant of conceptual combination: a reanalysis.

Authors:  Edward J Wisniewski; Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Basing categorization on individuals and events.

Authors:  L W Barsalou; J Huttenlocher; K Lamberts
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  When concepts combine.

Authors:  E J Wisniewski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

7.  Context and structure in conceptual combination.

Authors:  D L Medin; E J Shoben
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions.

Authors:  J A Hampton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-01

9.  Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers.

Authors:  R Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition.

Authors:  R A Stanfield; R A Zwaan
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-03
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Relation priming in established compounds: facilitation?

Authors:  Thomas L Spalding; Christina L Gagné
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-11

2.  Embodied conceptual combination.

Authors:  Dermot Lynott; Louise Connell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-11-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.