Literature DB >> 17672381

Models in search of a brain.

Bradley C Love1, Todd M Gureckis.   

Abstract

Mental localization efforts tend to stress the where more than the what. We argue that the proper targets for localization are well-specified cognitive models. We make this case by relating an existing cognitive model of category learning to a learning circuit involving the hippocampus, perirhinal, and prefrontal cortices. Results from groups varying in function along this circuit (e.g., infants, amnesics, and older adults) are successfully simulated by reducing the model's ability to form new clusters in response to surprising events, such as an error in supervised learning or an unfamiliar stimulus in unsupervised learning. Clusters in the model are akin to conjunctive codes that are rooted in an episodic experience (the surprising event) yet can develop to resemble abstract codes as they are updated by subsequent experiences. Thus, the model holds that the line separating episodic and semantic information can become blurred. Dissociations (categorization vs. recognition) are explained in terms of cluster recruitment demands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17672381     DOI: 10.3758/cabn.7.2.90

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  108 in total

1.  Conscious awareness, memory and the hippocampus.

Authors:  H Eichenbaum
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Exemplar theory's predicted typicality gradient can be tested and disconfirmed.

Authors:  J David Smith
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-09

3.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.

Authors:  J K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 4.  Late-training amnesic deficits in probabilistic category learning: a neurocomputational analysis.

Authors:  M A Gluck; L M Oliver; C E Myers
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Hippocampal volume losses in minimally impaired elderly.

Authors:  A Convit; M J de Leon; C Tarshish; S De Santi; A Kluger; H Rusinek; A E George
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-01-28       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Attentional networks.

Authors:  M I Posner; S Dehaene
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 7.  Neuron numbers and dendritic extent in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  P D Coleman; D G Flood
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  Categorization and recognition performance of a memory-impaired group: evidence for single-system models.

Authors:  Safa R Zaki; Robert M Nosofsky; Nenette M Jessup; Frederick W Unverzagt
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.892

9.  Hippocampal formation size in normal human aging: a correlate of delayed secondary memory performance.

Authors:  J Golomb; A Kluger; M J de Leon; S H Ferris; A Convit; M S Mittelman; J Cohen; H Rusinek; S De Santi; A E George
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  29 in total

1.  Activation in the neural network responsible for categorization and recognition reflects parameter changes.

Authors:  Robert M Nosofsky; Daniel R Little; Thomas W James
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Computational Models Inform Clinical Science and Assessment: An Application to Category Learning in Striatal-Damaged Patients.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; J Vincent Filoteo; Dagmar Zeithamova
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.223

3.  The dimensionality of perceptual category learning: a state-trace analysis.

Authors:  Ben R Newell; John C Dunn; Michael Kalish
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

4.  A high-distortion enhancement effect in the prototype-learning paradigm: dramatic effects of category learning during test.

Authors:  Safa R Zaki; Robeir M Nosofsky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

5.  When more is less: feedback effects in perceptual category learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; Bradley C Love; Brian D Glass; J Vincent Filoteo
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-05-01

6.  Age-related declines in the fidelity of newly acquired category representations.

Authors:  Tyler Davis; Bradley C Love; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Decoding the brain's algorithm for categorization from its neural implementation.

Authors:  Michael L Mack; Alison R Preston; Bradley C Love
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Infants' Visual Recognition Memory for a Series of Categorically Related Items.

Authors:  Lisa M Oakes; Kristine A Kovack-Lesh
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2012-03-07

9.  Model-based cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Thomas J Palmeri; Bradley C Love; Brandon M Turner
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.223

10.  A Comparison of the neural correlates that underlie rule-based and information-integration category learning.

Authors:  Kathryn L Carpenter; Andy J Wills; Abdelmalek Benattayallah; Fraser Milton
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.