Literature DB >> 9728382

Failure of a carbon fiber implant. A case report.

T Tullberg1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Case report.
OBJECTIVES: Failure of a carbon fiber implant. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To simplify the procedure of posterior lumbar interbody fusion, a carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer implant has been developed. The implant has ridges to resist retropulsion, struts to support weight, and a hollow area to allow packing of autologous bone graft. So far, no complications have been reported from the use of carbon implant as a fusion aid in spine surgery.
METHODS: A patient with postoperative infection has been followed with computed tomography images and histologic examination from a reoperation.
RESULTS: An entire nonunion across the width of the disc space and a clearly broken cage was visualized with computed tomography. The spinal canal was explored during a reoperation and the tissue surrounding the dura and nerves were all black. Microscopic examination showed a large quantity of carbon particulate debris. The authors have operated on approximately 100 patients so far and no other carbon cage has broken, to their knowledge.
CONCLUSIONS: Carbon cages can break if a nonunion occurs and as a result free carbon particles move out to the spinal canal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9728382     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199808150-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  14 in total

1.  Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Biomaterials in orthopaedics.

Authors:  M Navarro; A Michiardi; O Castaño; J A Planell
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Assessment of BioPlex interbody fusion device in a sheep lumbar fusion model.

Authors:  Douglas C Fredericks; Anup A Gandhi; Nicole M Grosland; Joseph D Smucker
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

4.  Evaluation of the 96/4 PLDLLA polymer resorbable lumbar interbody cage in a long term animal model.

Authors:  Jean Y Lazennec; Abdallah Madi; Marc A Rousseau; Bernard Roger; Gérard Saillant
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Debris of carbon-fibers originated from a CFRP (pEEK) wrist-plate triggered a destruent synovitis in human.

Authors:  Antonio Merolli; Lorenzo Rocchi; Marco De Spirito; Francesco Federico; Alessandro Morini; Luigi Mingarelli; Francesco Fanfani
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  A novel synthetic material for spinal fusion: a prospective clinical trial of porous bioactive titanium metal for lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Mitsuru Takemoto; Masashi Neo; Tomiharu Matsushita; Tadashi Kokubo; Kenji Doi; Tatsuya Ito; Akira Shimizu; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Poly(Propylene Fumarate)-Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite Can Be a Suitable Candidate for Cervical Cages.

Authors:  Yong Teng; Hugo Giambini; Asghar Rezaei; Xifeng Liu; A Lee Miller; Brian E Waletzki; Lichun Lu
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Two-level contiguous cervical disc disease treated with peek cages packed with demineralized bone matrix: results of 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kivanç Topuz; Ahmet Colak; Serdar Kaya; Hakan Simşek; Murat Kutlay; Mehmet Nusret Demircan; Murat Velioğlu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; John N Devine
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  The memory metal minimal access cage: a new concept in lumbar interbody fusion-a prospective, noncomparative study to evaluate the safety and performance.

Authors:  D Kok; R D Donk; F H Wapstra; A G Veldhuizen
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.