Literature DB >> 15480659

Patient-perceived outcome measures following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with mini-incision.

I Jahromi1, N P Walton, P J Dobson, P L Lewis, D G Campbell.   

Abstract

We reviewed 150 patients (183 knees) who underwent mini-incision unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (Oxford). Mean age was 71.5 (36-92) years. Review was conducted at least 12 months following surgery. To assess results, we used the Oxford knee questionnaire, modified Grimby score, return to sport and work, knee "normality" and patient general health. The mean Oxford knee score was 22.17 (range 12-54). Kneeling scored worse than other activities. No significant age or gender difference was found. Mean modified Grimby score was 3.89, equating to moderate exercise less than 2 h a week. Patients with "artificial-feeling" knees had significantly worse scores than patients with normal/near-normal-feeling knees. Patients who returned to/increased sporting activity had better Oxford scores than those who did not. Ninety-four percent of patients working pre-operatively returned to work. Sixty-seven percent continued at the same level of or increased sporting activity. Oxford knee scores and return to sport compared well to published data. Results regarding modified Grimby score, return to work and pain relief were encouraging. The best results were achieved in active patients who felt their health was good and their knee felt normal or near normal following surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15480659      PMCID: PMC3456975          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-004-0573-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  20 in total

1.  Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series.

Authors:  U C Svärd; A J Price
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-03

2.  Endurance sports after total knee replacement: a biomechanical investigation.

Authors:  M S Kuster; E Spalinger; B A Blanksby; A Gächter
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision.

Authors:  A J Price; J Webb; H Topf; C A Dodd; J W Goodfellow; D W Murray
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Perceptions of outcomes after unicompartmental and total knee replacements.

Authors:  A E Weale; O A Halabi; P W Jones; S H White
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Does arthritis progress in the retained compartments after 'Oxford' medial unicompartmental arthroplasty? A clinical and radiological study with a minimum ten-year follow-up.

Authors:  A E Weale; D W Murray; R Crawford; V Psychoyios; A Bonomo; G Howell; J O'Connor; J W Goodfellow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-09

6.  What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements?

Authors:  Jennifer M Weiss; Philip C Noble; Michael A Conditt; Harold W Kohl; Seth Roberts; Karon F Cook; Michael J Gordon; Kenneth B Mathis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Pitfalls of using patient recall to derive preoperative status in outcome studies of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  E A Lingard; E A Wright; C B Sledge
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments.

Authors:  P H Bullens; C J van Loon; M C de Waal Malefijt; R F Laan; R P Veth
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 9.  Exercise recommendations after total joint replacement: a review of the current literature and proposal of scientifically based guidelines.

Authors:  Markus S Kuster
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 10.  Athletic activity after total joint replacement.

Authors:  Mathew A Nicholls; Jeffrey B Selby; James M Hartford
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  22 in total

1.  [Pre- and postoperative radioligical evaluation of knee joint endoprothesis. Orthopedist's view].

Authors:  F Mazoochian; C Glaser; A Fottner; S M Hauptmann; M Triantafyllou; C von Schulze Pellengahr; M F Reiser; V Jansson
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Correlation of positioning and clinical results in Oxford UKA.

Authors:  Michael Clarius; Christian Hauck; Joern B Seeger; Maria Pritsch; Christian Merle; Peter R Aldinger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty database analysis: is there a winner?

Authors:  Matthew C Lyons; Steven J MacDonald; Lyndsay E Somerville; Douglas D Naudie; Richard W McCalden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Influence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis on functional outcome after unicondylar knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  S M Hauptmann; U Kreul; F Mazoochian; C V Schulze-Pellengahr; V Jansson; P E Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Outcomes and survivorship of unicondylar knee arthroplasty in patients with severe deformity.

Authors:  C S Seng; Derek C Ho; H C Chong; S L Chia; P L Chin; N N Lo; S J Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Reduced morphine consumption and pain intensity with local infiltration analgesia (LIA) following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Per Essving; Kjell Axelsson; Jill Kjellberg; Orjan Wallgren; Anil Gupta; Anders Lundin
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Participation in sporting activities following knee replacement: total versus unicompartmental.

Authors:  Graeme Philip Hopper; William Joseph Leach
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Is recovery faster for mobile-bearing unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Christopher A Walter; Jorge Aziz-Jacobo; Nicholas A Cheney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Beneficial and limiting factors affecting return to work after total knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  P P F M Kuijer; M J P M de Beer; J H P Houdijk; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-08-20

10.  Reduced hospital stay, morphine consumption, and pain intensity with local infiltration analgesia after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Per Essving; Kjell Axelsson; Jill Kjellberg; Orjan Wallgren; Anil Gupta; Anders Lundin
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.