Literature DB >> 9725601

Calculation of backscatter factors for diagnostic radiology using Monte Carlo methods.

N Petoussi-Henss1, M Zankl, G Drexler, W Panzer, D Regulla.   

Abstract

Backscatter factors were determined for x-ray beams relevant to diagnostic radiology using Monte Carlo methods. The phantom size considered most suitable for calibration of dosimeters is a cuboid of 30 x 30 cm2 front surface and 15 cm depth. This phantom size also provides a good approximation to adult patients. Three different media were studied: water, PMMA and ICRU tissue; the source geometry was a point source with varying field size and source-to-phantom distance. The variations of the backscatter factor with phantom medium and field geometry were examined. From the obtained data, a set of backscatter factors was selected and proposed for adoption as a standard set for the calibration of dosimeters to be used to measure diagnostic reference doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9725601     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/43/8/017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  23 in total

1.  Effective DQE (eDQE) and dose to optimize radiographic technical parameters: a survey of pediatric chest X-ray examinations in Korea.

Authors:  Hye-Suk Park; Ye-Seul Kim; Ok-Seob Park; Sang-Tae Kim; Chang-Woo Jeon; Hee-Joung Kim
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Monte Carlo investigation of backscatter point spread function for X-ray imaging examinations.

Authors:  Zhenyu Xiong; Sarath Vijayan; Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-03-09

3.  Calibration of GafChromic XR-RV3 radiochromic film for skin dose measurement using standardized x-ray spectra and a commercial flatbed scanner.

Authors:  Bradley P McCabe; Michael A Speidel; Tina L Pike; Michael S Van Lysel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Calculation of the entrance skin dose distribution for fluoroscopically guided interventions using a pencil beam backscatter model.

Authors:  Sarath Vijayan; Zhenyu Xiong; Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-14

5.  Estimates of Patient Radiation Doses in Digital Radiography Using DICOM Information at a Large Teaching Hospital in Oman.

Authors:  Ibrahim I Suliman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  How accurately can the peak skin dose in fluoroscopy be determined using indirect dose metrics?

Authors:  A Kyle Jones; Joe E Ensor; Alexander S Pasciak
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A new method of real-time skin dose visualization. Clinical evaluation of fluoroscopically guided interventions.

Authors:  Fazel Boujan; Nicolas Clauss; Emilie Santos; Sjirk Boon; Gerard Schouten; Luc Mertz; Jean-Louis Dietemann
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Neurointerventions in children: radiation exposure and its import.

Authors:  D B Orbach; C Stamoulis; K J Strauss; J Manchester; E R Smith; R M Scott; N Lin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Effective and organ specific radiation doses from videourodynamics in children.

Authors:  Ryan S Hsi; Jean Dearn; Melanie Dean; David A Zamora; Kalpana M Kanal; Jonathan D Harper; Paul A Merguerian
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Diagnostic reference levels in pediatric radiology in Austria.

Authors:  Jochen Billinger; Robert Nowotny; Peter Homolka
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.