Literature DB >> 9724767

Replicational and transcriptional selection on codon usage in Borrelia burgdorferi.

J O McInerney1.   

Abstract

With more than 10 fully sequenced, publicly available prokaryotic genomes, it is now becoming possible to gain useful insights into genome evolution. Before the genome era, many evolutionary processes were evaluated from limited data sets and evolutionary models were constructed on the basis of small amounts of evidence. In this paper, I show that genes on the Borrelia burgdorferi genome have two separate, distinct, and significantly different codon usages, depending on whether the gene is transcribed on the leading or lagging strand of replication. Asymmetrical replication is the major source of codon usage variation. Replicational selection is responsible for the higher number of genes on the leading strands, and transcriptional selection appears to be responsible for the enrichment of highly expressed genes on these strands. Replicational-transcriptional selection, therefore, has an influence on the codon usage of a gene. This is a new paradigm of codon selection in prokaryotes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9724767      PMCID: PMC27958          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

1.  The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene.

Authors:  F Wright
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1990-03-01       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  Progression of the cell cycle through mitosis leads to abortion of nascent transcripts.

Authors:  A W Shermoen; P H O'Farrell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-10-18       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  An extreme codon preference strategy: codon reassignment.

Authors:  G E Andersson; C G Kurland
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase.

Authors:  R K Saiki; D H Gelfand; S Stoffel; S J Scharf; R Higuchi; G T Horn; K B Mullis; H A Erlich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-01-29       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity.

Authors:  M Gouy; C Gautier
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1982-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Codon catalog usage is a genome strategy modulated for gene expressivity.

Authors:  R Grantham; C Gautier; M Gouy; M Jacobzone; R Mercier
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1981-01-10       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Recognition of protein coding regions in DNA sequences.

Authors:  J W Fickett
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1982-09-11       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Codon usage in regulatory genes in Escherichia coli does not reflect selection for 'rare' codons.

Authors:  P M Sharp; W H Li
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1986-10-10       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translational system.

Authors:  T Ikemura
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1981-09-25       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Codon usage in Aspergillus nidulans.

Authors:  A T Lloyd; P M Sharp
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1991-11
View more
  76 in total

1.  Strand asymmetry and codon usage bias in the chloroplast genome of Euglena gracilis.

Authors:  B R Morton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Horizontal gene transfer in bacterial and archaeal complete genomes.

Authors:  S Garcia-Vallvé; A Romeu; J Palau
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 3.  Through a genome, darkly: comparative analysis of plant chromosomal DNA.

Authors:  Graham J King
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.076

4.  How does replication-associated mutational pressure influence amino acid composition of proteins?

Authors:  A Gierlik; M Kowalczuk; M R Dudek; S Cebrat
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Use and misuse of correspondence analysis in codon usage studies.

Authors:  Guy Perrière; Jean Thioulouse
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Mutational and selective pressures on codon and amino acid usage in Buchnera, endosymbiotic bacteria of aphids.

Authors:  Claude Rispe; François Delmotte; Roeland C H J van Ham; Andres Moya
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  AMIGene: Annotation of MIcrobial Genes.

Authors:  Stéphanie Bocs; Stéphane Cruveiller; David Vallenet; Grégory Nuel; Claudine Médigue
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Synonymous codon usage is subject to selection in thermophilic bacteria.

Authors:  David J Lynn; Gregory A C Singer; Donal A Hickey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Solving the riddle of codon usage preferences: a test for translational selection.

Authors:  Mario dos Reis; Renos Savva; Lorenz Wernisch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-09-24       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Analysis of synonymous codon usage in the UL24 gene of duck enteritis virus.

Authors:  Renyong Jia; Anchun Cheng; Mingshu Wang; Hongyi Xin; Yufei Guo; Dekang Zhu; Xuefeng Qi; Lichan Zhao; Han Ge; Xiaoyue Chen
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 2.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.