Literature DB >> 10330120

How does replication-associated mutational pressure influence amino acid composition of proteins?

A Gierlik, M Kowalczuk, M R Dudek, S Cebrat.   

Abstract

We have performed detrended DNA walks on whole prokaryotic genomes, on noncoding sequences and, separately, on each position in codons of coding sequences. Our method enables us to distinguish between the mutational pressure associated with replication and the mutational pressure associated with transcription and other mechanisms that introduce asymmetry into prokaryotic chromosomes. In many prokaryotic genomes, each component of mutational pressure affects coding sequences not only in silent positions but also in positions in which changes cause amino acid substitutions in coded proteins. Asymmetry in the silent positions of codons differentiates the rate of translation of mRNA produced from leading and lagging strands. Asymmetry in the amino acid composition of proteins resulting from replication-associated mutational pressure also corresponds to leading and lagging roles of DNA strands, whereas asymmetry connected with transcription and coding function corresponds to the distance of genes from the origin or terminus of chromosome replication.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10330120      PMCID: PMC310782     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  28 in total

Review 1.  Biological asymmetries and the fidelity of eukaryotic DNA replication.

Authors:  T A Kunkel
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Similar-sized daughter-strand gaps are produced in the leading and lagging strands of DNA in UV-irradiated E. coli uvrA cells.

Authors:  T C Wang; S H Chen
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Asymmetric substitution patterns in the two DNA strands of bacteria.

Authors:  J R Lobry
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 4.  Organization and plasticity of enterobacterial genomes.

Authors:  B M Wilkins
Journal:  Soc Appl Bacteriol Symp Ser       Date:  1988

5.  Mechanism of DNA chain growth. I. Possible discontinuity and unusual secondary structure of newly synthesized chains.

Authors:  R Okazaki; T Okazaki; K Sakabe; K Sugimoto; A Sugino
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  When polymerases collide: replication and the transcriptional organization of the E. coli chromosome.

Authors:  B J Brewer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Asymmetries generated by transcription-coupled repair in enterobacterial genes.

Authors:  M P Francino; L Chao; M A Riley; H Ochman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Anatomy of a DNA replication fork revealed by reconstitution of SV40 DNA replication in vitro.

Authors:  S Waga; B Stillman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-05-19       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd.

Authors:  R D Fleischmann; M D Adams; O White; R A Clayton; E F Kirkness; A R Kerlavage; C J Bult; J F Tomb; B A Dougherty; J M Merrick
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-07-28       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Okazaki DNA fragments contain equal amounts of lagging-strand and leading-strand sequences.

Authors:  T C Wang; S H Chen
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1994-02-15       Impact factor: 3.575

View more
  19 in total

1.  Where does bacterial replication start? Rules for predicting the oriC region.

Authors:  Pawel Mackiewicz; Jolanta Zakrzewska-Czerwinska; Anna Zawilak; Miroslaw R Dudek; Stanislaw Cebrat
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Similar compositional biases are caused by very different mutational effects.

Authors:  Eduardo P C Rocha; Marie Touchon; Edward J Feil
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Atypical at skew in Firmicute genomes results from selection and not from mutation.

Authors:  Catherine A Charneski; Frank Honti; Josephine M Bryant; Laurence D Hurst; Edward J Feil
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  Use of a multi-way method to analyze the amino acid composition of a conserved group of orthologous proteins in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Alberto Pasamontes; Santiago Garcia-Vallve
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Asymmetric directional mutation pressures in bacteria.

Authors:  Jean R Lobry; Noboru Sueoka
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 13.583

6.  Codon usages of genes on chromosome, and surprisingly, genes in plasmid are primarily affected by strand-specific mutational biases in Lawsonia intracellularis.

Authors:  Feng-Biao Guo; Jian-Bo Yuan
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 4.458

7.  A blueprint for a mutationist theory of replicative strand asymmetries formation.

Authors:  Vladislav V Khrustalev; Eugene V Barkovsky
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.236

8.  Coding constraints modulate chemically spontaneous mutational replication gradients in mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Hervé Seligmann
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.236

9.  Separating the effects of mutation and selection in producing DNA skew in bacterial chromosomes.

Authors:  Richard A Morton; Brian R Morton
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Quantitative analysis of mutation and selection pressures on base composition skews in bacterial chromosomes.

Authors:  Chi Chen; Carton W Chen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.