Literature DB >> 9721422

Cervical cancer screening.

A Katz1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the role of family physicians in screening for cancer of the cervix, to review the evidence for screening, in particular, frequency and technique for screening, and to review the reasons cervical cancer has not been prevented and the role of family physicians in addressing these failures. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: The value of screening has been established with level II evidence. Many of the unresolved issues are not supported either way by good evidence; level II and III evidence predominates. MAIN
FINDINGS: In Canada, 1350 women were predicted to be diagnosed with cancer of the cervix in 1996. Most of these women had not been screened. Minority, rural, low-income, and older women face important barriers to screening. Family physicians have a role in reaching out to these women to provide effective health care, including cancer screening. When cancer screening is performed, it should conform to recommended techniques with appropriate follow up of abnormal test results.
CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians have an important role in preventing cancer of the cervix. Efforts should be concentrated on encouraging a greater proportion of eligible women to be screened. Criteria are suggested for effective screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9721422      PMCID: PMC2277725     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  18 in total

1.  Cervical cancer screening performed by a nurse. Evaluation in family practice.

Authors:  H Thommasen; P Lenci; I Brake; G Anderson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Cervical cytology: a randomized comparison of four sampling methods.

Authors:  M L McCord; T G Stovall; J L Meric; R L Summitt; S A Coleman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Cervical cancer screening: are the 1989 recommendations still valid? National Workshop on Screening for Cancer of the Cervix.

Authors:  E J Parboosingh; G Anderson; E A Clarke; S Inhaber; E Kaegi; C Mills; Y Mao; L Root; G Stuart; S Stachenko
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Comparison of four cytologic sampling techniques in a large family planning center.

Authors:  A Szarewski; G Curran; R Edwards; J Cuzick; G Kocjan; W Bounds; J Guillebaud
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.319

5.  Factors associated with cervical cancer screening: results from the Ontario Health Survey.

Authors:  V Goel
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr

6.  A cohort study of cervical cancer screening in British Columbia.

Authors:  D A Boyes; B Morrison; E G Knox; G J Draper; A B Miller
Journal:  Clin Invest Med       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 0.825

Review 7.  Common problems in Papanicolaou smear interpretation.

Authors:  R M DeMay
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 8.  Invasive cancer of the cervix in British Columbia: a review of the demography and screening histories of 437 cases seen from 1985-1988.

Authors:  G H Anderson; J L Benedet; J C Le Riche; J P Matisic; J E Thompson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Cervical cytology screening. How can we improve rates among First Nations women in urban British Columbia?

Authors:  T G Hislop; H F Clarke; M Deschamps; R Joseph; P R Band; J Smith; N Le; R Atleo
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Preventive care and barriers to effective prevention. How do family physicians see it?

Authors:  B G Hutchison; J Abelson; C A Woodward; G Norman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.275

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cervical cancer prevention for all Canadians.

Authors:  J W Sellors
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Proper technique for Pap smears.

Authors:  M Dermer
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.275

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.