Literature DB >> 8828873

Cervical cytology screening. How can we improve rates among First Nations women in urban British Columbia?

T G Hislop1, H F Clarke, M Deschamps, R Joseph, P R Band, J Smith, N Le, R Atleo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine Pap smear screening rates among urban First Nations women in British Columbia; to identify facilitators and barriers; and to develop, implement, and evaluate specific interventions to improve Pap smear screening in Vancouver.
DESIGN: Computer records of band membership lists and the Cervical Cytology Screening Program registry were compared to determine screening rates; personal interviews and community meetings identified facilitators and barriers to urban screening programs. A community advisory committee and the project team collaborated on developing specific interventions. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Purposive sample of British Columbia First Nations women, focusing on women living in Vancouver.
INTERVENTIONS: Poster, art card, and follow-up pamphlet campaign; articles in First Nations community papers; community meetings; and Pap smear screening clinics for First Nations women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pap smear screening rates among BC First Nations women according to residence and reasons for not receiving Pap smears.
RESULTS: Pap smear screening rates were substantially lower among First Nations women than among other British Columbia women; older women had even lower rates. No clear differences were found among First Nations women residing on reserves, residing in Vancouver, or residing off reserves elsewhere in British Columbia. Facilitators and barriers to screening were similar among women residing on reserves and in Vancouver. Many First Nations women are greatly affected by health care providers' attitudes, abilities to provide clear information, and abilities to establish trusting relationships.
CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians are an important source of information and motivation for Pap smear screening among First Nations women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8828873      PMCID: PMC2146877     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  6 in total

1.  Rate of death from cervical cancer among native Indian women in British Columbia.

Authors:  P R Band; R P Gallagher; W J Threlfall; T G Hislop; M Deschamps; J Smith
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Participation in the British Columbia Cervical Cytology Screening Programme by Native Indian women.

Authors:  T G Hislop; M Deschamps; P R Band; J M Smith; H F Clarke
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct

3.  Barriers to cervical cytology screening in native women in British Columbia.

Authors:  M Deschamps; P R Band; T G Hislop; H F Clarke; J M Smith; V To Yee Ng
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1992

Review 4.  Report of a National Workshop on Screening for Cancer of the Cervix.

Authors:  A B Miller; G Anderson; J Brisson; J Laidlaw; N Le Pitre; P Malcolmson; P Mirwaldt; G Stuart; W Sullivan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Barriers to screening for cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  R K Peters; M B Bear; D Thomas
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Organisation and results of the cervical cytology screening programme in British Columbia, 1955-85.

Authors:  G H Anderson; D A Boyes; J L Benedet; J C Le Riche; J P Matisic; K C Suen; A J Worth; A Millner; O M Bennett
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-04-02
  6 in total
  20 in total

1.  Cervical cancer prevention for all Canadians.

Authors:  J W Sellors
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Pap screening clinics with native women in Skidegate, Haida Gwaii. Need for innovation.

Authors:  B Calam; L Norgrove; D Brown; M A Wilson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Factors important in promoting cervical cancer screening among Canadian women: findings from the 1996-97 National Population Health Survey (NPHS).

Authors:  C J Maxwell; C M Bancej; J Snider; S A Vik
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

4.  Delivering equitable care: comparing preventive services in Manitoba.

Authors:  Sumit Gupta; Leslie L Roos; Randy Walld; Dawn Traverse; Matthew Dahl
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Cervical cancer among Aboriginal women in Canada.

Authors:  Alain A Demers; Erich V Kliewer; Olivia Remes; Jay Onysko; Katherine Dinner; Tom Wong; Gayatri C Jayaraman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  A qualitative study of provider perspectives of structural barriers to cervical cancer screening among first nations women.

Authors:  Marion Maar; Ann Burchell; Julian Little; Gina Ogilvie; Alberto Severini; Jinghao Mary Yang; Ingeborg Zehbe
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct

Review 7.  Cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  A Katz
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Cervical cancer: screening hard-to-reach groups.

Authors:  E Grunfeld
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  A Guide for Health Professionals Working with Aboriginal Peoples: Cross Cultural Understanding.

Authors: 
Journal:  J SOGC       Date:  2001-02

10.  Community-based cultural predictors of Pap smear screening in Nova Scotia.

Authors:  Grace M Johnston; Christopher J Boyd; Margery A MacIsaac
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.