Literature DB >> 1615986

Cervical cytology: a randomized comparison of four sampling methods.

M L McCord1, T G Stovall, J L Meric, R L Summitt, S A Coleman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare smear quality and endocervical cell recovery of four cervical smear sampling devices. STUDY
DESIGN: Two thousand fifteen patients undergoing routine cervical smears at the University of Tennessee Obstetrics and Gynecology clinics were randomly assigned to a cotton swab-spatula, Cytobrush-spatula, Cervex-Brush, or Bayne Pap Brush. The cytopathology laboratory, blind to method, used specific criteria to grade smears as being optimal, adequate, marginal, or inadequate. Statistical analysis was by the chi 2 and analysis of variance tests.
RESULTS: No statistical differences occurred among the groups for nonpregnant patients. For pregnant patients smear quality was improved with both Cytobrush-spatula and Bayne Pap Brush versus cotton swab-spatula (p = 0.0301 and 0.0004, respectively); cotton swab-spatula had fewer endocervical cells than the Cytobrush-spatula (p = 0.0001), Cervex-Brush (p = 0.0288), and Bayne Pap Brush (p = 0.0081).
CONCLUSIONS: The cotton swab-spatula and Cytobrush-spatula appear to be the most effective screening methods for nonpregnant and pregnant patients, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1615986     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91568-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  3 in total

Review 1.  Cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  A Katz
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Collection of the BD SurePath Pap Test with a broom device plus endocervical brush improves disease detection when compared to the broom device alone or the spatula plus endocervical brush combination.

Authors:  Sharon Davis-Devine; Sarah J Day; Amy Anderson; Ashley French; Darcy Madison-Henness; Naomi Mohar; Danielle Tansy; Adarsh Hiremath; Jeffrey A Douglas; Gregory G Freund
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 2.091

3.  Additional collection devices used in conjunction with the SurePath Liquid-Based Pap Test broom device do not enhance diagnostic utility.

Authors:  Sarah J Day; Darla L O'Shaughnessy; Jason C O'Connor; Gregory G Freund
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 2.809

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.