Literature DB >> 1603476

Invasive cancer of the cervix in British Columbia: a review of the demography and screening histories of 437 cases seen from 1985-1988.

G H Anderson1, J L Benedet, J C Le Riche, J P Matisic, J E Thompson.   

Abstract

The charts of 437 patients with newly diagnosed invasive cervical cancer seen in British Columbia during 1985-1988 were reviewed to determine the age at diagnosis, stage of disease, and histology of the lesions. The patient's immigration status and country of birth were also examined. Two hundred forty-two patients (55%) were age 50 or over and 149 (34%) had preclinical stage IB disease. One hundred seventy of these patients (39%) had never had a cytologic examination before presenting with clinical symptoms, and 45 additional patients had not had cytology for 5 or more years before presenting with invasive disease; thus, a total of 215 cases (49%) fell into the category of "no cytology or cytology longer than 5 years ago." All negative smears were reviewed and in 39 patients (15%) having previous cytology, abnormal cells had been missed or undercalled. Native Indian women made up 10% of the cases of invasive carcinoma, a disproportionately large number as they represent only 2% of the British Columbian population. Of the 27 Native Indian patients in this series, 16 (59%) had never had a cytologic examination. Eighty-five (30%) of 276 women born in Canada had never had a cytologic examination, compared with 34 (71%) of 48 immigrants resident in the country for fewer than 10 years. Twenty-four patients were over the age of 60 with a history of negative Papanicolaou smears. We conclude that, if further gains are to be made in the reduction of death rates from invasive cervical carcinoma, new means must be found to encourage women to participate in Papanicolaou smear screening programs. In particular, special efforts must be made to attract specific groups, such as the Native Indian population and older recent immigrants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1603476     DOI: 10.3109/01443619209029905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  8 in total

1.  Would female inmates accept Papanicolaou smear screening if it was offered to them during their incarceration?

Authors:  R E Martin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-03-07       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Rate of death from cervical cancer among native Indian women in British Columbia.

Authors:  P R Band; R P Gallagher; W J Threlfall; T G Hislop; M Deschamps; J Smith
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Cervical cancer screening performed by a nurse. Evaluation in family practice.

Authors:  H Thommasen; P Lenci; I Brake; G Anderson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Cervical cancer screening: are the 1989 recommendations still valid? National Workshop on Screening for Cancer of the Cervix.

Authors:  E J Parboosingh; G Anderson; E A Clarke; S Inhaber; E Kaegi; C Mills; Y Mao; L Root; G Stuart; S Stachenko
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  A Katz
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Compliance in screening programmes. High compliance essential in cervical screening programme...

Authors:  D Jenkins; S Gallivan; C Sherlaw-Johnson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-03-05

Review 7.  Pap test results. Responding to Bethesda system reports.

Authors:  T J Colgan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Barriers to HIV Testing in Black Immigrants to the U.S.

Authors:  Bisola Ojikutu; Chioma Nnaji; Juliet Sithole-Berk; Laura M Bogart; Philimon Gona
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2014-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.