Literature DB >> 9718956

Assessing auditory distance perception using perceptually directed action.

J M Loomis1, R L Klatzky, J W Philbeck, R G Golledge.   

Abstract

Three experiments investigated auditory distance perception under natural listening conditions in a large open field. Targets varied in egocentric distance from 3 to 16 m. By presenting visual targets at these same locations on other trials, we were able to compare visual and auditory distance perception under similar circumstances. In some experimental conditions, observers made verbal reports of target distance. In others, observers viewed or listened to the target and then, without further perceptual information about the target, attempted to face the target, walk directly to it, or walk along a two-segment indirect path to it. The primary results were these. First, the verbal and walking responses were largely concordant, with the walking responses exhibiting less between-observer variability. Second, different motoric responses provided consistent estimates of the perceived target locations and, therefore, of the initially perceived distances. Third, under circumstances for which visual targets were perceived more or less correctly in distance using the more precise walking response, auditory targets were generally perceived with considerable systematic error. In particular, the perceived locations of the auditory targets varied only about half as much in distance as did the physical targets; in addition, there was a tendency to underestimate target distance, except for the closest targets.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9718956     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  25 in total

1.  Dissociation between location and shape in visual space.

Authors:  Jack M Loomis; John W Philbeck; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Systematic distortions of perceptual stability investigated using immersive virtual reality.

Authors:  Lili Tcheang; Stuart J Gilson; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Misperception of exocentric directions in auditory space.

Authors:  Joeanna C Arthur; John W Philbeck; Jesse Sargent; Stephen Dopkins
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-06-13

4.  Psychophysical evidence for auditory motion parallax.

Authors:  Daria Genzel; Michael Schutte; W Owen Brimijoin; Paul R MacNeilage; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The importance of a visual horizon for distance judgments under severely degraded vision.

Authors:  Kristina M Rand; Margaret R Tarampi; Sarah H Creem-Regehr; William B Thompson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  MPI CyberMotion Simulator: implementation of a novel motion simulator to investigate multisensory path integration in three dimensions.

Authors:  Michael Barnett-Cowan; Tobias Meilinger; Manuel Vidal; Harald Teufel; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Orientation dependence of spatial memory acquired from auditory experience.

Authors:  Naohide Yamamoto; Amy L Shelton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

8.  Planning paths to multiple targets: memory involvement and planning heuristics in spatial problem solving.

Authors:  J M Wiener; N N Ehbauer; H A Mallot
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-08

Review 9.  Effect of dual sensory loss on auditory localization: implications for intervention.

Authors:  Helen J Simon; Harry Levitt
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-12

10.  Measurement of instantaneous perceived self-motion using continuous pointing.

Authors:  Joshua H Siegle; Jennifer L Campos; Betty J Mohler; Jack M Loomis; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.