Literature DB >> 29531082

Psychophysical evidence for auditory motion parallax.

Daria Genzel1,2, Michael Schutte1, W Owen Brimijoin3, Paul R MacNeilage2,4, Lutz Wiegrebe5,2.   

Abstract

Distance is important: From an ecological perspective, knowledge about the distance to either prey or predator is vital. However, the distance of an unknown sound source is particularly difficult to assess, especially in anechoic environments. In vision, changes in perspective resulting from observer motion produce a reliable, consistent, and unambiguous impression of depth known as motion parallax. Here we demonstrate with formal psychophysics that humans can exploit auditory motion parallax, i.e., the change in the dynamic binaural cues elicited by self-motion, to assess the relative depths of two sound sources. Our data show that sensitivity to relative depth is best when subjects move actively; performance deteriorates when subjects are moved by a motion platform or when the sound sources themselves move. This is true even though the dynamic binaural cues elicited by these three types of motion are identical. Our data demonstrate a perceptual strategy to segregate intermittent sound sources in depth and highlight the tight interaction between self-motion and binaural processing that allows assessment of the spatial layout of complex acoustic scenes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory updating; depth perception; distance discrimination; self-motion; spatial hearing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29531082      PMCID: PMC5910811          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1712058115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  30 in total

1.  Direct-to-reverberant energy ratio sensitivity.

Authors:  Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Neuronal representations of distance in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Norbert Kopčo; Samantha Huang; John W Belliveau; Tommi Raij; Chinmayi Tengshe; Jyrki Ahveninen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Minimum audible movement angle as a function of the azimuth and elevation of the source.

Authors:  T Z Strybel; C L Manligas; D R Perrott
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.888

Review 4.  Depth perception by the active observer.

Authors:  Mark Wexler; Jeroen J A van Boxtel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Minimum audible movement angles as a function of sound source trajectory.

Authors:  K Saberi; D R Perrott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception.

Authors:  B Rogers; M Graham
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Estimating distance during self-motion: a role for visual-vestibular interactions.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Paul R MacNeilage; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Acoustic cues for sound source distance and azimuth in rabbits, a racquetball and a rigid spherical model.

Authors:  Duck O Kim; Brian Bishop; Shigeyuki Kuwada
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-05

Review 9.  Auditory distance perception in humans: a review of cues, development, neuronal bases, and effects of sensory loss.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Brian C J Moore; Pavel Zahorik; Silvia Cirstea; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  The moving minimum audible angle is smaller during self motion than during source motion.

Authors:  W Owen Brimijoin; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  5 in total

1.  Auditory motion parallax.

Authors:  William A Yost
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Frequency-dependent integration of auditory and vestibular cues for self-motion perception.

Authors:  Corey S Shayman; Robert J Peterka; Frederick J Gallun; Yonghee Oh; Nai-Yuan N Chang; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Benefits of active listening during 3D sound localization.

Authors:  V Gaveau; A Coudert; R Salemme; E Koun; C Desoche; E Truy; A Farnè; F Pavani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Cortical auditory distance representation based on direct-to-reverberant energy ratio.

Authors:  Norbert Kopco; Keerthi Kumar Doreswamy; Samantha Huang; Stephanie Rossi; Jyrki Ahveninen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Auditory motion perception emerges from successive sound localizations integrated over time.

Authors:  Vincent Roggerone; Jonathan Vacher; Cynthia Tarlao; Catherine Guastavino
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.