J Y Choi1, K H Lee, S J Kim, S E Kim, B T Kim, S H Lee, W R Lee. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Sung Kyun Kwan University College of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Because equivocal fixed perfusion defects on single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) often cause a diagnostic dilemma in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), we used receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate the degree of increased accuracy provided by adding gated images for interpretation of such cases. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred five (29%) of 365 consecutive patients undergoing technetium 99m tetrofosmin gated SPECT for evaluation of CAD demonstrated an equivocal fixed defect. Two independent observers graded the probability for true lesion with a 5-point system over 3 steps of interpretation: reviewing tomographic images alone (step 1), adding projection images (step 2), and adding gated cine images (step 3). Based on clinical criteria, 66 patients were categorized as disease negative and 25 as disease positive, while the final diagnosis was undetermined in 14 cases. Diagnostic performance was significantly higher at step 3 than at step 1 for both observers (p < 0.05 and < 0.0001) and at step 2 for observer B (p < 0.005). The maximum accuracy increased from 78.0% to 80.2% at step 2 to 84.6% to 86.8% at step 3. Moreover, the agreement of interpretation between the 2 observers was higher at step 3 (kappa = 0.53) than at step 1 (kappa = 0.29) or step 2 (kappa = 0.25). CONCLUSION: In patients showing an equivocal fixed defect on 99mTc tetrofosmin SPECT, gated cine images provide improved differential accuracy and enhanced objectivity of interpretation by reducing interobserver variance.
BACKGROUND: Because equivocal fixed perfusion defects on single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) often cause a diagnostic dilemma in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), we used receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate the degree of increased accuracy provided by adding gated images for interpretation of such cases. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred five (29%) of 365 consecutive patients undergoing technetium 99m tetrofosmin gated SPECT for evaluation of CAD demonstrated an equivocal fixed defect. Two independent observers graded the probability for true lesion with a 5-point system over 3 steps of interpretation: reviewing tomographic images alone (step 1), adding projection images (step 2), and adding gated cine images (step 3). Based on clinical criteria, 66 patients were categorized as disease negative and 25 as disease positive, while the final diagnosis was undetermined in 14 cases. Diagnostic performance was significantly higher at step 3 than at step 1 for both observers (p < 0.05 and < 0.0001) and at step 2 for observer B (p < 0.005). The maximum accuracy increased from 78.0% to 80.2% at step 2 to 84.6% to 86.8% at step 3. Moreover, the agreement of interpretation between the 2 observers was higher at step 3 (kappa = 0.53) than at step 1 (kappa = 0.29) or step 2 (kappa = 0.25). CONCLUSION: In patients showing an equivocal fixed defect on 99mTc tetrofosmin SPECT, gated cine images provide improved differential accuracy and enhanced objectivity of interpretation by reducing interobserver variance.
Authors: E E DePasquale; A C Nody; E G DePuey; E V Garcia; G Pilcher; C Bredlau; G Roubin; A Gober; A Gruentzig; P D'Amato Journal: Circulation Date: 1988-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: B Hesse; K Tägil; A Cuocolo; C Anagnostopoulos; M Bardiés; J Bax; F Bengel; E Busemann Sokole; G Davies; M Dondi; L Edenbrandt; P Franken; A Kjaer; J Knuuti; M Lassmann; M Ljungberg; C Marcassa; P Y Marie; F McKiddie; M O'Connor; E Prvulovich; R Underwood; B van Eck-Smit Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Christopher L Hansen; Richard A Goldstein; Daniel S Berman; Keith B Churchwell; C David Cooke; James R Corbett; S James Cullom; Seth T Dahlberg; James R Galt; Ravi K Garg; Gary V Heller; Mark C Hyun; Lynne L Johnson; April Mann; Benjamin D McCallister; Raymond Taillefer; R Parker Ward; John J Mahmarian Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Christopher L Hansen; Richard A Goldstein; Olakunle O Akinboboye; Daniel S Berman; Elias H Botvinick; Keith B Churchwell; C David Cooke; James R Corbett; S James Cullom; Seth T Dahlberg; Regina S Druz; Edward P Ficaro; James R Galt; Ravi K Garg; Guido Germano; Gary V Heller; Milena J Henzlova; Mark C Hyun; Lynne L Johnson; April Mann; Benjamin D McCallister; Robert A Quaife; Terrence D Ruddy; Senthil N Sundaram; Raymond Taillefer; R Parker Ward; John J Mahmarian Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Sharmila Dorbala; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam; Ian S Armstrong; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; E Gordon DePuey; Andrew J Einstein; Robert J Gropler; Thomas A Holly; John J Mahmarian; Mi-Ae Park; Donna M Polk; Raymond Russell; Piotr J Slomka; Randall C Thompson; R Glenn Wells Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: P Hendrik Pretorius; Michael A King; Howard C Gifford; Seth T Dahlberg; Frederick Spencer; Ellen Simon; Jason Rashkin; Naomi Botkin; William Berndt; Manoj V Narayanan; Jeffrey A Leppo Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2005 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: S R Underwood; C Anagnostopoulos; M Cerqueira; P J Ell; E J Flint; M Harbinson; A D Kelion; A Al-Mohammad; E M Prvulovich; L J Shaw; A C Tweddel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 9.236