BACKGROUND: The aim was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) with a technetium-labelled (Tc) perfusion tracer to detect myocardial infarction (MI) in a clinical population referred for assessment of stress-induced ischemia using late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as reference method. METHODS: 119 patients referred for evaluation of stress-induced ischemia with MPS were included. 108 patients (age 62 ± 10 years, 39% females) completed MPS and CMR. A 2-day protocol for MPS was used for most patients (n = 105). RESULTS: MI was found in 31 patients (29%) using MPS and in 30 patients using CMR (28%). The sensitivity and specificity on a patient basis were 93% and 96%, respectively. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 90% and negative predictive value (NPV) was 97%. Per territory, the sensitivity and specificity for LAD infarcts were 83% and 97%, respectively. PPV was 77% and NPV was 98% for LAD infarcts. The sensitivity and specificity for RCA/LCx infarcts were 95% and 95%, respectively. PPV was 84% and NPV was 99% for RCA/LCx infarcts. The MI size on CMR was 12.0 ± 7.3% of the LV and mean transmurality was 66.3 ± 12.0%. All MI > 3% were detected on gated SPECT. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for gated Tc-MPS detecting subendocardial and transmural MI.
BACKGROUND: The aim was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) with a technetium-labelled (Tc) perfusion tracer to detect myocardial infarction (MI) in a clinical population referred for assessment of stress-induced ischemia using late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as reference method. METHODS: 119 patients referred for evaluation of stress-induced ischemia with MPS were included. 108 patients (age 62 ± 10 years, 39% females) completed MPS and CMR. A 2-day protocol for MPS was used for most patients (n = 105). RESULTS: MI was found in 31 patients (29%) using MPS and in 30 patients using CMR (28%). The sensitivity and specificity on a patient basis were 93% and 96%, respectively. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 90% and negative predictive value (NPV) was 97%. Per territory, the sensitivity and specificity for LAD infarcts were 83% and 97%, respectively. PPV was 77% and NPV was 98% for LAD infarcts. The sensitivity and specificity for RCA/LCxinfarcts were 95% and 95%, respectively. PPV was 84% and NPV was 99% for RCA/LCxinfarcts. The MI size on CMR was 12.0 ± 7.3% of the LV and mean transmurality was 66.3 ± 12.0%. All MI > 3% were detected on gated SPECT. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for gated Tc-MPS detecting subendocardial and transmural MI.
Authors: Tareq Ibrahim; Hubertus P Bülow; Thomas Hackl; Mira Hörnke; Stephan G Nekolla; Martin Breuer; Albert Schömig; Markus Schwaiger Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-12-29 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Henrik Engblom; Erik Hedström; Einar Heiberg; Galen S Wagner; Olle Pahlm; Håkan Arheden Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Adelaide M Arruda-Olson; Véronique L Roger; Allan S Jaffe; David O Hodge; Raymond J Gibbons; Todd D Miller Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-05
Authors: H Arheden; M Saeed; C B Higgins; D W Gao; J Bremerich; R Wyttenbach; M W Dae; M F Wendland Journal: Radiology Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Matthias Götberg; Göran K Olivecrona; Sasha Koul; Marcus Carlsson; Henrik Engblom; Martin Ugander; Jesper van der Pals; Lars Algotsson; Håkan Arheden; David Erlinge Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2010-08-24 Impact factor: 6.546
Authors: R J Kim; D S Fieno; T B Parrish; K Harris; E L Chen; O Simonetti; J Bundy; J P Finn; F J Klocke; R M Judd Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-11-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Tareq Ibrahim; Stephan G Nekolla; Mira Hörnke; Hubertus P Bülow; Josef Dirschinger; Albert Schömig; Markus Schwaiger Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-02-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Einar Heiberg; Martin Ugander; Henrik Engblom; Matthias Götberg; Göran K Olivecrona; David Erlinge; Håkan Arheden Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-11-30 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Helen Fransson; Michael Ljungberg; Marcus Carlsson; Henrik Engblom; Håkan Arheden; Einar Heiberg Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2014-02-15 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Fredrik Hedeer; Ellen Ostenfeld; Bo Hedén; Frits W Prinzen; Håkan Arheden; Marcus Carlsson; Henrik Engblom Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 5.952