Literature DB >> 9715857

Resuscitation preferences among patients with severe congestive heart failure: results from the SUPPORT project. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.

H M Krumholz1, R S Phillips, M B Hamel, J M Teno, P Bellamy, S K Broste, R M Califf, H Vidaillet, R B Davis, L H Muhlbaier, A F Connors, J Lynn, L Goldman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to describe the resuscitation preferences of patients hospitalized with an exacerbation of severe congestive heart failure, perceptions of those preferences by their physicians, and the stability of the preferences. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Of 936 patients in this study, 215 (23%) explicitly stated that they did not want to be resuscitated. Significant correlates of not wanting to be resuscitated included older age, perception of a worse prognosis, poorer functional status, and higher income. The physician's perception of the patient's preference disagreed with the patient's actual preference in 24% of the cases overall. Only 25% of the patients reported discussing resuscitation preferences with their physician, but discussion of preferences was not significantly associated with higher agreement between the patient and physician. Of the 600 patients who responded to the resuscitation question again 2 months later, 19% had changed their preferences, including 14% of those who initially wanted resuscitation (69 of 480) and 40% of those who initially did not (48 of 120). The physician's perception of the patient's hospital resuscitation preference was correct for 84% of patients who had a stable preference and 68% of those who did not.
CONCLUSIONS: Almost one quarter of patients hospitalized with severe heart failure expressed a preference not to be resuscitated. The physician's perception of the patient's preference was not accurate in about one quarter of the cases. but communication was not associated with greater agreement between the patient and the physician. A substantial proportion of patients who did not want to be resuscitated changed their minds within 2 months of discharge.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT)

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9715857     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.98.7.648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  39 in total

1.  Do not resuscitate decisions: flogging dead horses or a dignified death? Resuscitation should not be withheld from elderly people without discussion.

Authors:  S Ebrahim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-29

Review 2.  Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk.

Authors:  A Bowling; S Ebrahim
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

Review 3.  Systolic heart failure in the elderly: optimizing medical management.

Authors:  Jonathan P Man; Bodh I Jugdutt
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 4.  The use of hospital-based services by heart failure patients in the last year of life: a discussion paper.

Authors:  Gursharan K Singh; Patricia M Davidson; Peter S Macdonald; Phillip J Newton
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 5.  How to discuss goals of care with patients.

Authors:  Shannon M Dunlay; Jacob J Strand
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 6.677

Review 6.  Palliative care and end-of-life issues in patients treated with left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy.

Authors:  Keith M Swetz; Abigale L Ottenberg; Monica R Freeman; Paul S Mueller
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2011-09

7.  Research Priorities in Subspecialty Palliative Care: Policy Initiatives.

Authors:  Lynn F Reinke; Diane E Meier
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  Discordance of Patient-Reported and Clinician-Ordered Resuscitation Status in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.

Authors:  Kathleen A Young; Sara E Wordingham; Jacob J Strand; Vėronique L Roger; Shannon M Dunlay
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  End-of-Life Discussions in Patients With Heart Failure.

Authors:  Kathleen A Young; Margaret M Redfield; Jacob J Strand; Shannon M Dunlay
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 10.  Determining resuscitation preferences of elderly inpatients: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher Frank; Daren K Heyland; Benjamin Chen; Donald Farquhar; Kathryn Myers; Ken Iwaasa
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.