Literature DB >> 11533430

Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk.

A Bowling1, S Ebrahim.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11533430      PMCID： PMC1765740          DOI： 10.1136/qhc.0100002..

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Care        ISSN： 0963-8172


× No keyword cloud information.
  48 in total

Review 1.  The effects of information framing on the practices of physicians.

Authors:  P McGettigan; K Sly; D O'Connell; S Hill; D Henry
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Patients' ability to recall risk associated with treatment options.

Authors:  A J Lloyd; P D Hayes; N J London; P R Bell; A R Naylor
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--III: Population and context effects.

Authors:  D G Froberg; R L Kane
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Life-sustaining treatment decisions for nursing home residents: who discusses, who decides and what is decided?

Authors:  J R Levin; N S Wenger; J G Ouslander; G Zellman; J F Schnelle; J L Buchanan; S H Hirsch; D B Reuben
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics.

Authors:  C H Braddock; K A Edwards; N M Hasenberg; T L Laidley; W Levinson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999 Dec 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Opinions of elderly people on treatment for end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  S Ahmed; C Addicott; M Qureshi; N Pendleton; J E Clague; M A Horan
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.140

7.  Decision making in CPR: attitudes of hospital patients and healthcare professionals.

Authors:  I H Kerridge; S A Pearson; I E Rolfe; M Lowe
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1998-08-03       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Resuscitation preferences among patients with severe congestive heart failure: results from the SUPPORT project. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.

Authors:  H M Krumholz; R S Phillips; M B Hamel; J M Teno; P Bellamy; S K Broste; R M Califf; H Vidaillet; R B Davis; L H Muhlbaier; A F Connors; J Lynn; L Goldman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-08-18       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Patient participation in decision-making.

Authors:  E Guadagnoli; P Ward
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Design should help use of patients' data.

Authors:  J C Wyatt; P Wright
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-10-24       Impact factor: 79.321
View more
  45 in total

Review 1.  Older people's perspectives on fall risk and fall prevention programs: a literature review.

Authors:  Siobhan McMahon; Kristine M Talley; Jean F Wyman
Journal:  Int J Older People Nurs       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.115

Review 2.  The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions--challenges for doctors.

Authors:  Rebecca E Say; Richard Thomson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-06

3.  What influences participants' treatment preference and can it influence outcome? Results from a primary care-based randomised trial for shoulder pain.

Authors:  Elaine Thomas; Peter R Croft; Susan M Paterson; Krysia Dziedzic; Elaine M Hay
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Conjoint analysis: a 'new' way to evaluate patients' preferences.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 5.  Non-clinical influences on clinical decision-making: a major challenge to evidence-based practice.

Authors:  F M Hajjaj; M S Salek; M K A Basra; A Y Finlay
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Commentaries on "Informatics and medicine: from molecules to populations".

Authors:  R B Altman; R Balling; J F Brinkley; E Coiera; F Consorti; M A Dhansay; A Geissbuhler; W Hersh; S Y Kwankam; N M Lorenzi; F Martin-Sanchez; G I Mihalas; Y Shahar; K Takabayashi; G Wiederhold
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.176

7.  Chronic pain patients' treatment preferences: a discrete-choice experiment.

Authors:  Axel C Mühlbacher; Uwe Junker; Christin Juhnke; Edgar Stemmler; Thomas Kohlmann; Friedhelm Leverkus; Matthias Nübling
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-06-21

8.  Reasons underpinning patients' preferences for various angina treatments.

Authors:  Nigel Lambert; Gene Rowe; Ann Bowling; Shah Ebrahim; Michael Laurence; Jamie Dalrymple; Richard Thomson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Comparison of group counseling with individual counseling in the comprehension of informed consent: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rajiv Sarkar; Thuppal V Sowmyanarayanan; Prasanna Samuel; Azara S Singh; Anuradha Bose; Jayaprakash Muliyil; Gagandeep Kang
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Development and validation of a questionnaire on 'Satisfaction with dermatological treatment of hand eczema' (DermaSat).

Authors:  Miguel A Ruiz; Felipe Heras; Agusti Alomar; Luis Conde-Salazar; Jesús de la Cuadra; Esther Serra; Francisco Regalado; Ralf Halbach
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.186
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.