Literature DB >> 14557319

Determining resuscitation preferences of elderly inpatients: a review of the literature.

Christopher Frank1, Daren K Heyland, Benjamin Chen, Donald Farquhar, Kathryn Myers, Ken Iwaasa.   

Abstract

Studies have shown that discussions with elderly hospital patients about cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) preferences occur infrequently and have variable content. Our objective was to identify themes in the existing literature that could be used to increase the frequency and improve the quality of such discussions. We found that patients and families are familiar with the concept of CPR but have limited understanding of the procedure and overestimate its benefit. Most patients are interested in being involved in discussions about CPR and in sharing responsibility for decisions with physicians; however, older patients who participate in these discussions may have variable decision-making capacity. Physicians do not routinely discuss CPR with older patients, and patients do not initiate such discussions. When discussions do occur, the information provided to patients or families about resuscitation and its outcomes is not always consistent. Physicians should initiate CPR discussions, consider patients' levels of understanding and decision-making capacity, share responsibility for decisions where appropriate and involve the family where possible. Documentation of discussions and patient preferences may help to minimize misunderstandings and increase the stability of the decision during subsequent admissions to hospital.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14557319      PMCID: PMC203283     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  56 in total

1.  Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model.

Authors:  C Charles; A Gafni; T Whelan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  An analysis of CPR decision-making by elderly patients.

Authors:  G M Sayers; I Schofield; M Aziz
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 3.  Bioethics for clinicians: 16. Dealing with demands for inappropriate treatment.

Authors:  C Weijer; P A Singer; B M Dickens; S Workman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-10-06       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  The effect of hospital admission on the opinions and knowledge of elderly patients regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  D R Watson; T J Wilkinson; R Sainsbury; J E Kidd
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 10.668

5.  Patients who want their family and physician to make resuscitation decisions for them: observations from SUPPORT and HELP. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project.

Authors:  C M Puchalski; Z Zhong; M M Jacobs; E Fox; J Lynn; J Harrold; A Galanos; R S Phillips; R Califf; J M Teno
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  A consensus-based approach to providing palliative care to patients who lack decision-making capacity. ACP-ASIM End-of-Life Care Consensus Panel. American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine.

Authors:  J H Karlawish; T Quill; D E Meier
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-05-18       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Documenting life-support preferences in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  P Kernerman; D J Cook; L E Griffith
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.425

8.  Impediments to writing do-not-resuscitate orders.

Authors:  A H Eliasson; J M Parker; A F Shorr; K A Babb; R Harris; B A Aaronson; M Diemer
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999-10-11

9.  Resuscitation preferences among patients with severe congestive heart failure: results from the SUPPORT project. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.

Authors:  H M Krumholz; R S Phillips; M B Hamel; J M Teno; P Bellamy; S K Broste; R M Califf; H Vidaillet; R B Davis; L H Muhlbaier; A F Connors; J Lynn; L Goldman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-08-18       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Choices of seriously ill patients about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: correlates and outcomes. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.

Authors:  R S Phillips; N S Wenger; J Teno; R K Oye; S Youngner; R Califf; P Layde; N Desbiens; A F Connors; J Lynn
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  14 in total

1.  Should a reversible, but lethal, incident not be treated when a patient has a do-not-resuscitate order?

Authors:  Philip C Hébert; Debbie Selby
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Factors influencing ICU referral at the end of life in the elderly.

Authors:  R D Piers; D D Benoit; W J Schrauwen; N J Van Den Noortgate
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 1.281

3.  An audit of "do not attempt resuscitation" decisions in two district general hospitals: do current guidelines need changing?

Authors:  Dylan Harris; Rachel Davies
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Predictors Associated with Survival Among Elderly In-Patients Who Receive Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Japan: An Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Tetsuro Hayashi; Masato Matsushima; Seiji Bito; Natsuko Kanazawa; Norihiko Inoue; Sarah Kyuragi Luthe; Christina C Wee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Canadian Cardiovascular Society Consensus Conference guidelines on heart failure--2008 update: best practices for the transition of care of heart failure patients, and the recognition, investigation and treatment of cardiomyopathies.

Authors:  J Malcom; O Arnold; Jonathan G Howlett; Anique Ducharme; Justin A Ezekowitz; Martin J Gardner; Nadia Giannetti; Haissam Haddad; George A Heckman; Debra Isaac; Philip Jong; Peter Liu; Elizabeth Mann; Robert S McKelvie; Gordon W Moe; Anna M Svendsen; Ross T Tsuyuki; Kelly O'Halloran; Heather J Ross; Errol J Sequeira; Michel White
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  The Natural History of Changes in Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatments and Implications for Inpatient Mortality in Younger and Older Hospitalized Adults.

Authors:  Yan S Kim; Gabriel J Escobar; Scott D Halpern; John D Greene; Patricia Kipnis; Vincent Liu
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Supporting shared decision-making about cardiopulmonary resuscitation using a video-based decision-support intervention in a hospital setting: a multisite before-after pilot study.

Authors:  John J You; Dev Jayaraman; Marilyn Swinton; Xuran Jiang; Daren K Heyland
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2019-10-25

8.  Evaluation of nurses' perceptions on providing patient decision support with cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Nicole Pyl; Prudy Menard
Journal:  ISRN Nurs       Date:  2012-12-05

9.  Identification of high-risk subgroups in very elderly intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Sophia E de Rooij; Ameen Abu-Hanna; Marcel Levi; Evert de Jonge
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Reversals and limitations on high-intensity, life-sustaining treatments.

Authors:  Gustavo Chavez; Ilana B Richman; Rajani Kaimal; Jason Bentley; Lee Ann Yasukawa; Russ B Altman; Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil; Jonathan H Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.