Kathleen A Young1, Margaret M Redfield2, Jacob J Strand1, Shannon M Dunlay3. 1. Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 2. Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 3. Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: dunlay.shannon@mayo.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although guidelines call on clinicians to conduct regular conversations about advance care planning and end-of-life (EOL) preferences with patients with heart failure (HF), research suggests that physicians often avoid these discussions. METHODS AND RESULTS: From January 20, 2014, to January 18, 2016, Southeastern Minnesota residents hospitalized with acute decompensated HF (ADHF) at Mayo Clinic hospitals were enrolled into an observational cohort study that included the administration of face-to-face questionnaires. Risk of death (prognosis) was estimated using the Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure score. Among 400 patients (mean age 77.7 years, 46% female, 48% preserved ejection fraction), only 69 (17%) reported previously discussing EOL wishes with their physician. Patients reporting EOL discussions more often had an advance directive (81% vs 66%; P = .009), recognized the term "hospice" (96% vs 87%; P = .027), and had more favorable attitudes of dying and hospice (P = .030). Resuscitation preferences and rates of completion of advance directives varied with prognosis, although patient-clinician EOL discussions did not. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients hospitalized with ADHF did not recall discussing their preferences for EOL care with their physician. This represents an important modifiable gap in the optimal longitudinal care of HF patients.
BACKGROUND: Although guidelines call on clinicians to conduct regular conversations about advance care planning and end-of-life (EOL) preferences with patients with heart failure (HF), research suggests that physicians often avoid these discussions. METHODS AND RESULTS: From January 20, 2014, to January 18, 2016, Southeastern Minnesota residents hospitalized with acute decompensated HF (ADHF) at Mayo Clinic hospitals were enrolled into an observational cohort study that included the administration of face-to-face questionnaires. Risk of death (prognosis) was estimated using the Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure score. Among 400 patients (mean age 77.7 years, 46% female, 48% preserved ejection fraction), only 69 (17%) reported previously discussing EOL wishes with their physician. Patients reporting EOL discussions more often had an advance directive (81% vs 66%; P = .009), recognized the term "hospice" (96% vs 87%; P = .027), and had more favorable attitudes of dying and hospice (P = .030). Resuscitation preferences and rates of completion of advance directives varied with prognosis, although patient-clinician EOL discussions did not. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients hospitalized with ADHF did not recall discussing their preferences for EOL care with their physician. This represents an important modifiable gap in the optimal longitudinal care of HF patients.
Authors: Dariush Mozaffarian; Emelia J Benjamin; Alan S Go; Donna K Arnett; Michael J Blaha; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Sarah de Ferranti; Jean-Pierre Després; Heather J Fullerton; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Paul Muntner; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Mathew J Reeves; Carlos J Rodriguez; Wayne Rosamond; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Daniel Woo; Robert W Yeh; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-01-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Stuart J Pocock; Cono A Ariti; John J V McMurray; Aldo Maggioni; Lars Køber; Iain B Squire; Karl Swedberg; Joanna Dobson; Katrina K Poppe; Gillian A Whalley; Rob N Doughty Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Pamela N Peterson; Susan M Shetterly; Christina L Clarke; David B Bekelman; Paul S Chan; Larry A Allen; Daniel D Matlock; David J Magid; Frederick A Masoudi Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-04-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: H M Krumholz; R S Phillips; M B Hamel; J M Teno; P Bellamy; S K Broste; R M Califf; H Vidaillet; R B Davis; L H Muhlbaier; A F Connors; J Lynn; L Goldman Journal: Circulation Date: 1998-08-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Shannon M Dunlay; Jilian L Foxen; Terese Cole; Molly A Feely; Ann R Loth; Jacob J Strand; Jean A Wagner; Keith M Swetz; Margaret M Redfield Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2014-12-08 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: R S Phillips; N S Wenger; J Teno; R K Oye; S Youngner; R Califf; P Layde; N Desbiens; A F Connors; J Lynn Journal: Am J Med Date: 1996-02 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Larry A Allen; Lynne W Stevenson; Kathleen L Grady; Nathan E Goldstein; Daniel D Matlock; Robert M Arnold; Nancy R Cook; G Michael Felker; Gary S Francis; Paul J Hauptman; Edward P Havranek; Harlan M Krumholz; Donna Mancini; Barbara Riegel; John A Spertus Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: JinShil Kim; Mi-Seung Shin; Albert Youngwoo Jang; Shinmi Kim; Seongkum Heo; EunSeok Cha; Minjeong An Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Florence Landry-Hould; Blandine Mondésert; Andrew G Day; Heather J Ross; Judith Brouillette; Brian Clarke; Shelley Zieroth; Mustafa Toma; Marie-Claude Parent; Robert A Fowler; John J You; Anique Ducharme Journal: CJC Open Date: 2021-08-08