Literature DB >> 9715151

Does laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery increase exfoliated cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity during resection of colorectal cancer?

S H Kim1, J W Milsom, T L Gramlich, S M Toddy, G I Shore, J Okuda, V W Fazio.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Traumatic manipulation of cancer specimens during laparoscopic colectomy may increase exfoliation of malignant cells into the peritoneal cavity, causing an early occurrence of peritoneal carcinomatosis or port-sites recurrence. Because of this concern, the routine use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy after laparoscopic colectomy for cancer was suggested recently. We assessed if laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery increases exfoliated malignant cells in the peritoneal cavity during resection of colorectal cancer.
METHODS: In a prospective, randomized fashion, 38 colorectal cancer patients undergoing an elective, curative operation were assigned to either a conventional or laparoscopic procedure between June 1996 and May 1997. In either group (n = 19), after the abdominal cavity was entered, saline was instilled into the peritoneal cavity, and the fluid was collected (Specimen 1). During surgery, all irrigating fluids were collected (Specimen 2). Both specimens were assessed for malignancy using four techniques: filtration process (ThinPrep), smear, cell block, and immunochemistry using Ber-EP4. The change in the amount of tumor cells in both specimens was compared between surgical groups. A pilot study was performed to validate the proposed cytologic method.
RESULTS: In the pilot study of 20 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer, postresectional peritoneal cytology was positive in six patients, including two Stage II (T3, N0, M0) patients. The pilot study also validated that our semiquantitative scoring system can be reliably used to assess the amount of free peritoneal cancer cells. In the main study, 16 right colectomies, 3 extended right colectomies, 17 proctosigmoidectomies, and 1 left colectomy were performed. The T and N stages were T1 (n = 13, T2 (n = 5), T3 (n = 8), T4 (n = 11); N0 (n =22), N1 (n = 8), N2 (n = 7). Malignant cells were not detected in any Specimens 1 or, more importantly, in Specimens 2 in either surgical group.
CONCLUSION: When performed according to strict oncologic surgical principles, laparoscopic techniques in curative colorectal cancer surgery did not have an increased risk of intraperitoneal cancer cell spillage, compared with conventional techniques. We hope that these results can decrease some of the concerns about tumor cell spillage and seeding during laparoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9715151     DOI: 10.1007/bf02237382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  18 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Andrea Vignali; Luca Gianotti; Walter Zuliani; Giovanni Radaelli; Paola Gruarin; Paolo Dellabona; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  [Endoscopy in urology].

Authors:  Günter Janetschek
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 3.  Peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin: incidence and current treatment strategies.

Authors:  Manuel J Koppe; Otto C Boerman; Wim J G Oyen; Robert P Bleichrodt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Systematic review of laparoscopy-assisted versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Long-yun Ye; Da-ren Liu; Chao Li; Xiao-wen Li; Ling-na Huang; Sheng Ye; Yi-xiong Zheng; Li Chen
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.066

5.  Completely laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for early and advanced gastric cancer: a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Fabrizio Moisan; Enrique Norero; Milenko Slako; Julián Varas; Gonzalo Palominos; Fernando Crovari; Luis Ibañez; Gustavo Pérez; Fernando Pimentel; Sergio Guzmán; Nicolás Jarufe; Camilo Boza; Alex Escalona; Ricardo Funke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection.

Authors:  E Kuhry; W F Schwenk; R Gaupset; U Romild; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-04-16

7.  Surgical control and margin status after robotic and open cystectomy in high-risk cases: Caution or equivalence?

Authors:  Pranav Sharma; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Michael A Poch; Julio M Pow-Sang; Wade J Sexton; Philippe E Spiess; Scott M Gilbert
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for colorectal cancer: influence on neoplastic cell mobilization.

Authors:  X Bessa; A Castells; A M Lacy; J I Elizalde; S Delgado; L Boix; V Piñol; M Pellisé; J C García-Valdecasas; J M Piqué
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Does a laparoscopic approach affect the number of lymph nodes harvested during curative surgery for colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Galal El-Gazzaz; Tracy Hull; Jeffery Hammel; Daniel Geisler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Taurolidine reduces the tumor stimulating cytokine interleukin-1beta in patients with resectable gastrointestinal cancer: a multicentre prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Chris Braumann; Carsten N Gutt; Johannes Scheele; Charalambos Menenakos; Wilhelm Willems; Joachim M Mueller; Christoph A Jacobi
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.