Literature DB >> 11309650

Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for colorectal cancer: influence on neoplastic cell mobilization.

X Bessa1, A Castells, A M Lacy, J I Elizalde, S Delgado, L Boix, V Piñol, M Pellisé, J C García-Valdecasas, J M Piqué.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal cancer has been suggested to enhance tumor dissemination. Recently, molecular techniques have been developed to detect micrometastatic disease in patients with solid tumors, with a higher accuracy than cytologic or immunohistochemical approaches. This study was undertaken to investigate the potential harmful effects of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy on neoplastic cell mobilization in patients with resectable colorectal cancer. Fifty patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to laparoscopic-assisted (LAC, n = 26) or open (OC, n = 24) colectomy. Peripheral venous blood samples were obtained preoperatively, immediately after tumor removal, and 24 hours later. In 10 patients from each treatment group, portal blood and peritoneal fluid samples were also obtained before and after resection. Neoplastic cells were detected by means of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction targeted to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) transcription. CEA mRNA was detected in peripheral venous blood samples from 35 of 50 colorectal cancer patients preoperatively. Among those 15 baseline-negative patients, four experienced conversion 24 hours after tumor resection (2 [33%] of 6 in the LAC group vs. 2 [22%] of 9 in the OC group; NS). At that time point, clearance of CEA mRNA expression was observed in 14 of the 35 baseline-positive patients (9 [45%] of 20 in the LAC group vs. 5 [33%] of 15 in the OC group; NS). In addition, only one patient in the LAC group with baseline-negative CEA mRNA expression experienced portal blood conversion after tumor removal, although his peripheral blood level remained negative. Finally, baseline peritoneal fluid CEA mRNA expression was never detected, but one patient in each group became positive postoperatively. These results confirm that preoperative and perioperative mobilization of neoplastic cells is a frequent occurrence in patients with colorectal cancer, but the surgical approach (LAC vs. OC) does not seem to be a determining factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11309650     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(01)80015-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  38 in total

1.  The influence of laparotomy and laparoscopy on tumor growth in a rat model.

Authors:  C A Jacobi; J Ordemann; B Böhm; H U Zieren; C Liebenthal; H D Volk; J M Müller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  No-touch isolation technique reduces intraoperative shedding of tumor cells into the portal vein during resection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N Hayashi; H Egami; M Kai; Y Kurusu; S Takano; M Ogawa
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Impact of gas(less) laparoscopy and laparotomy on peritoneal tumor growth and abdominal wall metastases.

Authors:  N D Bouvy; R L Marquet; H Jeekel; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Limitations of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analyses for detection of micrometastatic epithelial cancer cells in bone marrow.

Authors:  A Zippelius; P Kufer; G Honold; M W Köllermann; R Oberneder; G Schlimok; G Riethmüller; K Pantel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Wound metastases following laparoscopic and open surgery for abdominal cancer in a rat model.

Authors:  G Mathew; D I Watson; A M Rofe; C F Baigrie; T Ellis; G G Jamieson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Molecular detection of circulating cancer cells during surgery in patients with biliary-pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  F Miyazono; S Takao; S Natsugoe; K Uchikura; F Kijima; K Aridome; H Shinchi; T Aikou
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Does laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery increase exfoliated cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity during resection of colorectal cancer?

Authors:  S H Kim; J W Milsom; T L Gramlich; S M Toddy; G I Shore; J Okuda; V W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Cloning of the complete gene for carcinoembryonic antigen: analysis of its promoter indicates a region conveying cell type-specific expression.

Authors:  H Schrewe; J Thompson; M Bona; L J Hefta; A Maruya; M Hassauer; J E Shively; S von Kleist; W Zimmermann
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group.

Authors:  J W Fleshman; H Nelson; W R Peters; H C Kim; S Larach; R R Boorse; W Ambroze; P Leggett; R Bleday; S Stryker; B Christenson; S Wexner; A Senagore; D Rattner; J Sutton; A P Fine
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 10.  Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy.

Authors:  S D Wexner; S M Cohen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Is minimal access surgery for cancer associated with immunologic benefits?

Authors:  Calvin S H Ng; Richard L Whelan; Antonio M Lacy; Anthony P C Yim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Prognostic value of postoperative detection of blood circulating tumor cells in patients with colorectal cancer operated on for cure.

Authors:  Xavier Bessa; Virgínia Piñol; Sergi Castellví-Bel; Elena Piazuelo; Antonio M Lacy; J Ignasi Elizalde; Josep M Piqué; Antoni Castells
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Influence of postoperative acute-phase response on angiogenesis and tumor growth: open vs. laparoscopic-assisted surgery in mice.

Authors:  Miguel Pera; Heidi Nelson; S Vincent Rajkumar; Tonia M Young-Fadok; Lawrence J Burgart
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Decreased incidence of isolated tumor cells in lymph nodes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  E S van der Zaag; C J Buskens; M S Vlug; H M Peters; W H Bouma; W A Bemelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Influence of surgical manipulation and surgical modality on the molecular detection of circulating tumor cells from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Soo Yeun Park; Gyu-Seog Choi; Jun Seok Park; Hye Jin Kim; Jong-Pil Ryuk; Whon-Ho Choi
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2012-05-29

6.  Colorectal cancer metastasis: in the surgeon's hands?

Authors:  Gary Atkin; Abhay Chopada; Ian Mitchell
Journal:  Int Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-02-24

7.  Favorable short-term oncologic outcomes following laparoscopic surgery for small T4 colon cancer: a multicenter comparative study.

Authors:  Sung Sil Park; Joon Sang Lee; Hyoung-Chul Park; Sung Chan Park; Dae Kyung Sohn; Jae Hwan Oh; Kyung Su Han; Dong-Won Lee; Dong-Eun Lee; Sung-Bum Kang; Kyu Joo Park; Seung-Yong Jeong
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Evaluation of laparoscopic resection of colorectal carcinoma from the viewpoint of molecular biology.

Authors:  Matej Skrovina; Miloslav Duda; Josef Srovnal; Jiri Bartos; Lenka Radova; Marian Hajduch; Renata Soumarova
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 1.195

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.