Literature DB >> 9709271

Periodic screening for breast cancer: the HIP Randomized Controlled Trial. Health Insurance Plan.

S Shapiro1.   

Abstract

This paper summarizes the findings of the first breast cancer screening trial, which was initiated in December 1963 to explore the efficacy of screening. Women aged 40-64 years were selected from enrollees in the Health Insurance Plan (HIP) of Greater New York and were randomly assigned to study and control groups. Study group women were invited for screening, an initial examination, and three annual reexaminations. Screening consisted of film mammography (cephalocaudal and lateral views of each breast) and clinical examination of breasts. Breast cancer and mortality from breast cancer were examined by treatment group (study vs. control) and by entry-age subgroup. By the end of 18 years from entry, the study group had about a 25% lower breast cancer mortality among women aged 40-49 and 50-59 at time of entry than did the control group. However, to a large extent the difference among the 40-49-year-olds occurred in the subgroup with breast cancer diagnosed after these women had passed their 50th birthday, and utility of screening women in their forties is questionable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9709271     DOI: 10.1093/jncimono/1997.22.27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  31 in total

Review 1.  Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  J Ringash
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  CJS debate: Is mammography useful in average-risk screening for breast cancer?

Authors:  Muriel Brackstone; Steven Latosinsky; Elizabeth Saettler; Ralph George
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 3.  Statistical analyses in Swedish randomised trials on mammography screening and in other randomised trials on cancer screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol; Michel Smans; Richard Sullivan; Peter Boyle
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  The evolution of cancer surgery and future perspectives.

Authors:  Lynda Wyld; Riccardo A Audisio; Graeme J Poston
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Breast Cancer Screening: a Paradigm Change Is Needed-the PB Desai Oration.

Authors:  Ismail Jatoi
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-03

6.  Image quality and dose efficiency of high energy phase sensitive x-ray imaging: phantom studies.

Authors:  Molly Donovan Wong; Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.535

7.  Medical monitoring: a beneficial remedy for residents living near an environmental hazard site.

Authors:  Robert Wones; Susan M Pinney; Jeanette M Buckholz; Colleen Deck-Tebbe; Ronald Freyberg; Amadeo Pesce
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.162

Review 8.  Breast cancer screening: review of benefits and harms, and recommendations for developing and low-income countries.

Authors:  Meteb Al-Foheidi; Mubarak M Al-Mansour; Ezzeldin M Ibrahim
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 9.  Risk-Reducing Options for Women with a Hereditary Breast Cancer Predisposition.

Authors:  Ismail Jatoi
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2018-10-01

10.  Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2007-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.