Literature DB >> 26574707

CJS debate: Is mammography useful in average-risk screening for breast cancer?

Muriel Brackstone1, Steven Latosinsky1, Elizabeth Saettler1, Ralph George1.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Given recent the debate over breast cancer screening that was reignited by the 25-year follow-up data from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study, the Canadian Journal of Surgery commissioned a group of Canadian experts to debate the value of screening mammography. We discuss the Canadian study and summarize the arguments in favour of and against screening mammography for average-risk patients. We also provide summary recommendations for the use of mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 26574707      PMCID： PMC4734922          DOI： 10.1503/cjs.017514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN： 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  20 in total

1.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: assessment of technical quality by external review.

Authors:  C J Baines; A B Miller; D B Kopans; M Moskowitz; D E Sanders; E A Sickles; T To; C Wall
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Screening mammography--a long run for a short slide?

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Epidemiology of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

4.  The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial.

Authors:  Nils Bjurstam; Lena Björneld; Jane Warwick; Evis Sala; Stephen W Duffy; Lennarth Nyström; Neil Walker; Erling Cahlin; Olof Eriksson; Lars-Olof Hafström; Halvard Lingaas; Jan Mattsson; Stellan Persson; Carl-Magnus Rudenstam; Håkan Salander; Johan Säve-Söderbergh; Torkel Wahlin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Kari Tyne; Arpana Naik; Christina Bougatsos; Benjamin K Chan; Linda Humphrey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Analysis of interval breast carcinomas in a randomized screening trial in Stockholm.

Authors:  J Frisell; G Eklund; L Hellström; A Somell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Mammographic breast cancer screening--a randomized trial in Malmö, Sweden.

Authors:  I Andersson; L Janzon; B F Sigfússon
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  S W Fletcher; W Black; R Harris; B K Rimer; S Shapiro
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04

10.  Breast screening, prognostic factors and survival--results from the Swedish two county study.

Authors:  S W Duffy; L Tabar; G Fagerberg; A Gad; O Gröntoft; M C South; N E Day
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 7.640
View more
  3 in total

1.  The mammography debate: the senior years.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  How Did CNBSS Influence Guidelines for So Long and What Can That Teach Us?

Authors:  Shushiela Appavoo
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  An atypical presentation of infiltrating ductal carcinoma.

Authors:  Kunal Kishor Jha; Suresh Kumar Gupta
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.