Literature DB >> 9709267

Breast cancer screening among women in their forties: an overview of the issues.

S W Fletcher1.   

Abstract

This article summarizes the issues prompting a recent NIH Consensus Conference on mammography screening for women in their forties. To date, eight randomized controlled trials of breast cancer screening have been conducted, and a reduction in breast cancer mortality has emerged after 10 to 15 years of follow-up among women offered screening in their forties. No effect appears for at least eight years, and the reason for the delay, compared to that seen in women aged 50-69, is not clear. Two possibilities include cancer-stage shift due to screening in younger women and the aging of women into their fifties during the course of screening. Possible adverse effects of screening include radiation risk, although this is low, false-negative and false-positive screening tests, and overdiagnosis due to detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). In order to make appropriate decisions regarding mammography, women need age-related information about both the benefits and potential risks of screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9709267     DOI: 10.1093/jncimono/1997.22.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  9 in total

Review 1.  Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  J Ringash
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne W Fletcher; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Diffuse Optics for Tissue Monitoring and Tomography.

Authors:  T Durduran; R Choe; W B Baker; A G Yodh
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2010-07

4.  Annual mammography at age 45-49 years and biennial mammography at age 50-69 years: comparing performance measures in an organised screening setting.

Authors:  Lauro Bucchi; Alessandra Ravaioli; Flavia Baldacchini; Orietta Giuliani; Silvia Mancini; Rosa Vattiato; Fabio Falcini; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Cinzia Campari; Debora Canuti; Enza Di Felice; Priscilla Sassoli de Bianchi; Stefano Ferretti; Nicoletta Bertozzi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Hereditary breast cancer. Risk assessment of patients with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  E Warner; R E Heisey; V Goel; J C Carroll; D R McCready
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Noninvasive functional optical spectroscopy of human breast tissue.

Authors:  N Shah; A Cerussi; C Eker; J Espinoza; J Butler; J Fishkin; R Hornung; B Tromberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A randomized trial of three videos that differ in the framing of information about mammography in women 40 to 49 years old.

Authors:  Carmen L Lewis; Michael P Pignone; Stacey L Sheridan; Stephen M Downs; Linda S Kinsinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors by in-vivo three-dimensional parallel-plate diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  Regine Choe; Soren D Konecky; Alper Corlu; Kijoon Lee; Turgut Durduran; David R Busch; Saurav Pathak; Brian J Czerniecki; Julia Tchou; Douglas L Fraker; Angela Demichele; Britton Chance; Simon R Arridge; Martin Schweiger; Joseph P Culver; Mitchell D Schnall; Mary E Putt; Mark A Rosen; Arjun G Yodh
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Do physicians tailor their recommendations for breast cancer risk reduction based on patient's risk?

Authors:  Jennifer S Haas; Celia P Kaplan; Steven E Gregorich; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Genevieve Des Jarlais
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.