Literature DB >> 9683771

Evolution and future of surface replacement of the hip.

H C Amstutz1, P Grigoris, F J Dorey.   

Abstract

Surface replacement is a bone-conserving alternative to total hip arthroplasty and is a significant development in the evolution of hip arthroplasty. Surface replacement with polyethylene bearings was largely abandoned, primarily because of component aseptic loosening caused by tissue reaction to high-volumetric polyethylene wear. For patients with osteonecrosis and collapse of the femoral head but with preservation of some acetabular articular cartilage, precision fit, hemisurface replacement of the femoral head only has emerged as the treatment of choice. The survivorship of our series of patients, performed in the 1981-84 era (average age, 32 years), has been 85% at 5 years, 67% at 10 years, and 42% at 16 years. In the absence of polyethylene, there has been no loosening. Revisions were for cartilage wear. The procedure is now much improved with instrumentation for non-trochanteric osteotomy approaches and off-the-shelf components in 1-mm increments. For arthritic hips, a new era of surface replacement has emerged. With metal-on-metal bearings, the volumetric wear has been reduced 20-100 times from those with polyethylene, and there is no penalty for the large ball size. The devices are now conservative on the acetabular as well as femoral side. Hybrid or all-cementless fixation is superior to earlier all-cemented devices. In those patients, the results with up to 4 years have been complication-free, with an absence of pain and a return to high functional levels, including participation in sports. Forty patients have received a Conserve Plus with interference fitting of the acetabular component with sintered beads to obtain fixation. Although the follow-up is short, surface replacement with the large ball size is extremely stable, and dislocation is rare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9683771     DOI: 10.1007/s007760050038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  20 in total

1.  Bone mineral density of the proximal femur recovers after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Matteo Cadossi; Antonio Moroni; Matteo Romagnoli; Eugenio Chiarello; Cesare Faldini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-05

2.  Hip resurfacing in patients who have osteonecrosis and are 25 years or under.

Authors:  Siraj A Sayeed; Aaron J Johnson; D Alex Stroh; Thomas P Gross; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  2011 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: when to release patients to high-impact activities after hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Katherine M Bedigrew; Erin L Ruh; Qin Zhang; John C Clohisy; Robert L Barrack; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Hip resurfacing: a technology reborn.

Authors:  Steven Cutts; Paul B Carter
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Surface replacement is comparable to primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mike S McGrath; David R Marker; Thorsten M Seyler; Slif D Ulrich; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: risk factors for failure over 25 years.

Authors:  Eric J Yue; Miguel E Cabanela; Gavan P Duffy; Michael G Heckman; Mary I O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The learning curve for adopting hip resurfacing among hip specialists.

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Jinjun Zhu; Peter J Brooks; C Anderson Engh; Stephen J Raterman; John S Rogerson; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Risk of impingement and third-body abrasion with 28-mm metal-on-metal bearings.

Authors:  Ian C Clarke; Jean-Yves Lazennec; Adrien Brusson; Christina Savisaar; John G Bowsher; Michelle Burgett; Thomas K Donaldson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-02-01

10.  Patients report improvement in quality of life and satisfaction after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wael A Rahman; Nelson V Greidanus; Alexander Siegmeth; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.