Literature DB >> 20963531

Hip resurfacing in patients who have osteonecrosis and are 25 years or under.

Siraj A Sayeed1, Aaron J Johnson, D Alex Stroh, Thomas P Gross, Michael A Mont.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Young patients with osteonecrosis (ON) treated with THA often have suboptimal function and radiographic failure with eventual revision. Resurfacing may be an option because of potentially increased functionality and decreased radiographic failure, although neither has been confirmed in the literature. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore compared the clinical scores and radiographic failures of resurfacing patients 25 years or younger with osteonecrosis with those for patients with ON treated with THA.
METHODS: We identified 17 patients (20 resurfaced hips) who were 25 years or younger and treated by resurfacing for ON. Mean followup was 62 months (range, 32-103 months). This group was matched by gender, age, BMI, and followup to 16 patients (20 hips) treated with THA with a mean 61 month followup (range, 34-88 months). Additionally, the group was compared to 78 patients (87 hips) with ON over age 25 who underwent resurfacing during the same time with a mean followup of 61 months (range, 27-112 months).
RESULTS: The mean Harris score improved from 48 points preoperatively to 93 points with a 100% 7.5 year survivorship in the young resurfacing group. In the THA cohort, the mean score improved from 44 points preoperatively to 94 points postoperatively, with a 93.3% 7.5 year survivorship; similar to the results for all resurfacing patients. Radiographs did not reveal malalignment or progressive radiolucencies in any cohort.
CONCLUSION: At approximately 5 year followup, young resurfacing patients were similar to other resurfacing patients and standard THA patients regarding clinical ratings and radiographic failures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20963531      PMCID: PMC3094641          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1629-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  36 in total

1.  Uncemented total hip arthroplasty in young adults with osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a comparative study.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; Thorsten M Seyler; Johannes F Plate; Ronald E Delanois; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Gait and stair function in total and resurfacing hip arthroplasty: a pilot study.

Authors:  M Wade Shrader; Manoshi Bhowmik-Stoker; Marc C Jacofsky; David J Jacofsky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Surface replacement is comparable to primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mike S McGrath; David R Marker; Thorsten M Seyler; Slif D Ulrich; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; Thorsten M Seyler; Phillip S Ragland; Roland Starr; Jochen Erhart; Anil Bhave
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Scott T Ball; Michel J Le Duff; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Transplacental transfer of cobalt and chromium in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: a controlled study.

Authors:  H Ziaee; J Daniel; A K Datta; S Blunt; D J W McMinn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-03

7.  The use of cementless expansion acetabular component and an alumina-polyethylene bearing in total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Y-G Kim; S-Y Kim; S-J Kim; B-C Park; P-T Kim; J-C Ihn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-06

8.  Use of metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; Thorsten M Seyler; David R Marker; German A Marulanda; Ronald E Delanois
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; David R Marker; Jonathan M Smith; Slif D Ulrich; Mike S McGrath
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Gait patterns after total hip arthroplasty and surface replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  Julie Nantel; Nicolas Termoz; Pascal-André Vendittoli; Martin Lavigne; François Prince
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  4 in total

1.  Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: An update in year 2012.

Authors:  Anjan P Kaushik; Anusuya Das; Quanjun Cui
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-05-18

2.  Modified porous tantalum rod technique for the treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Emilios E Pakos; Panayiotis Megas; Nikolaos K Paschos; Spyridon A Syggelos; Antonios Kouzelis; Georgios Georgiadis; Theodoros A Xenakis
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-18

3.  Early repair of necrotic lesion of the femoral head after high-degree posterior rotational osteotomy in young patients-a study evaluated by volume measurement using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Tsubasa Ishikwa; Takashi Atsumi; Satoshi Tamaoki; Ryosuke Nakanishi; Minoru Watanabe; Yasuoki Kobayashi; Satoe Tanabe; Toshihisa Kajiwara
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2015-03-30

Review 4.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in patients younger than 50 years: a retrospective analysis : 1285 cases, 12-year survivorship.

Authors:  Melissa D Gaillard; Thomas P Gross
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.