Literature DB >> 9668746

Reducing cesarean section rates safely: lessons from a "breakthrough series" collaborative.

B L Flamm1, D M Berwick, A Kabcenell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Almost one million cesarean operations are performed each year in the United States. The objective of this project was to test the hypothesis that a structured collaborative effort can help participating health care organizations to reduce their cesarean delivery rates safely.
METHODS: Experts associated with the collaborative helped participant organizations to explore several categories of change concepts and to develop action plans for safely reducing their cesarean delivery rates. Over the course of one year participants attended three two-day learning sessions. In the interval between these sessions, collaborative participants communicated by weekly conference calls and a dedicated Internet site.
RESULTS: Of 28 participating organizations, 15 percent achieved cesarean delivery rate reductions of 30 percent or more during the 12-month period of active collaborative work. An additional 50 percent achieved reductions between 10 and 30 percent.
CONCLUSIONS: The Healthy People 2000 goal of a cesarean delivery rate below 15 percent by the year 2000 is attainable. Clinical leadership from doctors and nurses toward the achievement of that goal is timely, ethical, and in the best interests of childbearing women in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9668746     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.1998.00117.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  22 in total

1.  Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study.

Authors:  J M Belizán; F Althabe; F C Barros; S Alexander
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-27

2.  Two kinds of knowledge to achieve better care.

Authors:  L A Headrick
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Glenn Robert; Fraser Macfarlane; Paul Bate; Olivia Kyriakidou
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 4.  Primary care practice-based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement.

Authors:  James W Mold; Kevin A Peterson
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Developing and implementing new safe practices: voluntary adoption through statewide collaboratives.

Authors:  L L Leape; G Rogers; D Hanna; P Griswold; F Federico; C A Fenn; D W Bates; L Kirle; B R Clarridge
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-08

6.  Lamaze International: P P-L f t 21 C.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2002

7.  Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the collaborative method: reflections from a single site.

Authors:  P J Newton; E J Halcomb; P M Davidson; A R Denniss
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-12

8.  Association not causation: what is the intervention?

Authors:  Michael C Klein
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 9.  Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes.

Authors:  Shinobu Kobayashi; Nobutsugu Hanada; Masayo Matsuzaki; Kenji Takehara; Erika Ota; Hatoko Sasaki; Chie Nagata; Rintaro Mori
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-20

Review 10.  Reducing maternal mortality and improving maternal health: Bangladesh and MDG 5.

Authors:  Marge Koblinsky; Iqbal Anwar; Malay Kanti Mridha; Mahbub Elahi Chowdhury; Roslin Botlero
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.