Literature DB >> 16885255

Developing and implementing new safe practices: voluntary adoption through statewide collaboratives.

L L Leape1, G Rogers, D Hanna, P Griswold, F Federico, C A Fenn, D W Bates, L Kirle, B R Clarridge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disseminating new safe practices has proved challenging. In a statewide initiative we developed a framework for (1) selecting two safe practices, (2) developing operational details of implementation, (3) enlisting hospitals to participate, and (4) facilitating implementation.
METHODS: Potential topics were selected by a multistep process to identify candidate practices, review the evidence for efficacy and feasibility, and then select them on the basis of importance, efficacy, feasibility, and impact. A multi-stakeholder advisory group representing all constituencies selected two practices: reconciling medications (RM) and communicating critical test results (CTR). Operational details and strategies for implementation were then developed for each practice using a consensus process of discipline stakeholders led by content experts. Hospital CEOs were solicited to participate by the Massachusetts Hospital Association which made the project a "flagship" initiative. A collaborative model was used to facilitate implementation, following the IHI Model for Improvement. In addition to providing exposure to content and method experts, we gave teams a "toolkit" containing recommendations, a change package, and implementation strategies. Each collaborative met four times over an 18 month period. Results were assessed using the IHI team assessment scale and surveys of teams and hospital leaders.
RESULTS: Hospital participation rate was high with 88% of hospitals participating in one or both collaboratives. Partial implementation of the practices was achieved by 50% of RM teams and 65% of CTR teams. Full implementation was achieved by 20% of teams for each.
CONCLUSIONS: Major factors leading to hospital participation included the intrinsic appeal of the practices, access to experts, and the availability of implementation strategies. Team success was correlated with active engagement of a senior administrator, engagement of physicians, increased use of PDSA cycles, and attendance at collaborative meetings. The prior development of subpractices, recommendations and implementation strategies was essential for the hospital teams. These should be well worked out before hospitals are required to implement any guideline.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16885255      PMCID: PMC2564013          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.017632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  12 in total

Review 1.  Using research to inform quality programmes.

Authors:  John Ovretveit; David Gustafson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-05

2.  Quality collaboratives: lessons from research.

Authors:  J ØVretveit; P Bate; P Cleary; S Cretin; D Gustafson; K McInnes; H McLeod; T Molfenter; P Plsek; G Robert; S Shortell; T Wilson
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-12

3.  Improving ICU care: it takes a team.

Authors:  Peter Pronovost; Chris Goeschel
Journal:  Healthc Exec       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr

4.  Reconciling medications at admission: safe practice recommendations and implementation strategies.

Authors:  Gina Rogers; Eric Alper; Diane Brunelle; Frank Federico; Clark A Fenn; Lucian L Leape; Leslie Kirle; Nancy Ridley; Brian R Clarridge; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Paula Griswold; Doris Hanna; Catherine L Annas
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2006-01

5.  Communicating critical test results: safe practice recommendations.

Authors:  Doris Hanna; Paula Griswold; Lucian L Leape; David W Bates
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2005-02

6.  Evaluation of a quality improvement collaborative in asthma care: does it improve processes and outcomes of care?

Authors:  Matthias Schonlau; Rita Mangione-Smith; Kitty S Chan; Joan Keesey; Mayde Rosen; Thomas A Louis; Shin-Yi Wu; Emmett Keeler
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Collaborative quality improvement for neonatal intensive care. NIC/Q Project Investigators of the Vermont Oxford Network.

Authors:  J D Horbar; J Rogowski; P E Plsek; P Delmore; W H Edwards; J Hocker; A D Kantak; P Lewallen; W Lewis; E Lewit; C J McCarroll; D Mujsce; N R Payne; P Shiono; R F Soll; K Leahy; J H Carpenter
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Reducing adverse drug events: lessons from a breakthrough series collaborative.

Authors:  L L Leape; A I Kabcenell; T K Gandhi; P Carver; T W Nolan; D M Berwick
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  2000-06

9.  What is driving hospitals' patient-safety efforts?

Authors:  Kelly J Devers; Hoangmai H Pham; Gigi Liu
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Reducing cesarean section rates safely: lessons from a "breakthrough series" collaborative.

Authors:  B L Flamm; D M Berwick; A Kabcenell
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.689

View more
  16 in total

1.  Spread tools: a systematic review of components, uptake, and effectiveness of quality improvement toolkits.

Authors:  Susanne Hempel; Claire O'Hanlon; Yee Wei Lim; Margie Danz; Jody Larkin; Lisa Rubenstein
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 7.327

2.  Understanding organisational development, sustainability, and diffusion of innovations within hospitals participating in a multilevel quality collaborative.

Authors:  Michel La Dückers; Cordula Wagner; Leti Vos; Peter P Groenewegen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  Applying the quality improvement collaborative method to process redesign: a multiple case study.

Authors:  Leti Vos; Michel L A Dückers; Cordula Wagner; Godefridus G van Merode
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Learning and improving in quality improvement collaboratives: which collaborative features do participants value most?

Authors:  Ingrid M Nembhard
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research.

Authors:  Thomas W Concannon; Melissa Fuster; Tully Saunders; Kamal Patel; John B Wong; Laurel K Leslie; Joseph Lau
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Medication errors in a swiss cardiovascular surgery department: a cross-sectional study based on a novel medication error report method.

Authors:  Kaspar Küng; Thierry Carrel; Brigitte Wittwer; Sandra Engberg; Natalie Zimmermann; René Schwendimann
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2013-01-31

Review 7.  Scoping review of toolkits as a knowledge translation strategy in health.

Authors:  Raluca Barac; Sherry Stein; Beth Bruce; Melanie Barwick
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Do quality improvement collaboratives' educational components match the dominant learning style preferences of the participants?

Authors:  Anne Marie Weggelaar-Jansen; Jeroen van Wijngaarden; Sarah-Sue Slaghuis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Factors to consider in the introduction of huddles on clinical wards: perceptions of staff on the SAFE programme.

Authors:  Emily Stapley; Evelyn Sharples; Peter Lachman; Monica Lakhanpaul; Miranda Wolpert; Jessica Deighton
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.038

10.  Quality requirements for cross-border care in Europe: a qualitative study of patients', professionals' and healthcare financiers' views.

Authors:  O Groene; P Poletti; P Vallejo; C Cucic; N Klazinga; R Suñol
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2009-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.