Literature DB >> 28435173

How attention influences perceptual decision making: Single-trial EEG correlates of drift-diffusion model parameters.

Michael D Nunez1,2, Joachim Vandekerckhove1,2,3, Ramesh Srinivasan1,4,3.   

Abstract

Perceptual decision making can be accounted for by drift-diffusion models, a class of decision-making models that assume a stochastic accumulation of evidence on each trial. Fitting response time and accuracy to a drift-diffusion model produces evidence accumulation rate and non-decision time parameter estimates that reflect cognitive processes. Our goal is to elucidate the effect of attention on visual decision making. In this study, we show that measures of attention obtained from simultaneous EEG recordings can explain per-trial evidence accumulation rates and perceptual preprocessing times during a visual decision making task. Models assuming linear relationships between diffusion model parameters and EEG measures as external inputs were fit in a single step in a hierarchical Bayesian framework. The EEG measures were features of the evoked potential (EP) to the onset of a masking noise and the onset of a task-relevant signal stimulus. Single-trial evoked EEG responses, P200s to the onsets of visual noise and N200s to the onsets of visual signal, explain single-trial evidence accumulation and preprocessing times. Within-trial evidence accumulation variance was not found to be influenced by attention to the signal or noise. Single-trial measures of attention lead to better out-of-sample predictions of accuracy and correct reaction time distributions for individual subjects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffusion Models; Electroencephalography (EEG); Hierarchical Bayesian modeling; Neurocognitive modeling; Perceptual decision making; Visual attention

Year:  2016        PMID: 28435173      PMCID: PMC5397902          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Psychol        ISSN: 0022-2496            Impact factor:   2.223


  51 in total

1.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation.

Authors:  T P Jung; S Makeig; C Humphries; T W Lee; M J McKeown; V Iragui; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Levels of selective attention revealed through analyses of response time distributions.

Authors:  D H Spieler; D A Balota; M E Faust
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Quality of evidence for perceptual decision making is indexed by trial-to-trial variability of the EEG.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Marios G Philiastides; Paul Sajda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evaluating methods for approximating stochastic differential equations.

Authors:  Scott D Brown; Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.223

6.  Individual differences in attention strategies during detection, fine discrimination, and coarse discrimination.

Authors:  David A Bridwell; Elizabeth A Hecker; John T Serences; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Human scalp potentials reflect a mixture of decision-related signals during perceptual choices.

Authors:  Marios G Philiastides; Hauke R Heekeren; Paul Sajda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  M N Shadlen; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Neural strategies for selective attention distinguish fast-action video game players.

Authors:  Lavanya Krishnan; Albert Kang; George Sperling; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  EEG oscillations reveal neural correlates of evidence accumulation.

Authors:  M K van Vugt; P Simen; L E Nystrom; P Holmes; J D Cohen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  19 in total

1.  Modelling individual difference in visual categorization.

Authors:  Jianhong Shen; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-11-10

2.  Quantifying mechanisms of cognition with an experiment and modeling ecosystem.

Authors:  Emily R Weichart; Kevin P Darby; Adam W Fenton; Brandon G Jacques; Ryan P Kirkpatrick; Brandon M Turner; Per B Sederberg
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-02-18

3.  Leave-One-Trial-Out, LOTO, a general approach to link single-trial parameters of cognitive models to neural data.

Authors:  Sebastian Gluth; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Task-general efficiency of evidence accumulation as a computationally-defined neurocognitive trait: Implications for clinical neuroscience.

Authors:  Alexander Weigard; Chandra Sripada
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci       Date:  2021-03-13

5.  Timing of readiness potentials reflect a decision-making process in the human brain.

Authors:  Kitty K Lui; Michael D Nunez; Jessica M Cassidy; Joachim Vandekerckhove; Steven C Cramer; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Comput Brain Behav       Date:  2020-11-25

6.  Fast evidence accumulation in social anxiety disorder enhances decision making in a probabilistic reward task.

Authors:  Daniel G Dillon; Amit Lazarov; Sarah Dolan; Yair Bar-Haim; Diego A Pizzagalli; Franklin R Schneier
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2021-12-30

7.  Model-based cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Thomas J Palmeri; Bradley C Love; Brandon M Turner
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.223

8.  Correlation of neural activity with behavioral kinematics reveals distinct sensory encoding and evidence accumulation processes during active tactile sensing.

Authors:  Ioannis Delis; Jacek P Dmochowski; Paul Sajda; Qi Wang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Accumulation of continuously time-varying sensory evidence constrains neural and behavioral responses in human collision threat detection.

Authors:  Gustav Markkula; Zeynep Uludağ; Richard McGilchrist Wilkie; Jac Billington
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Slow drift rate predicts ADHD symptomology over and above executive dysfunction.

Authors:  Jason S Feldman; Cynthia Huang-Pollock
Journal:  Child Neuropsychol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.597

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.