Literature DB >> 9665621

Brain stem frequency-following response to dichotic vowels during attention.

G C Galbraith1, S M Bhuta, A K Choate, J M Kitahara, T A Mullen.   

Abstract

Frequency-following responses (FFRs) were elicited by English long vowels (female /a/ and male /e/) in a dichotic listening task. Stimuli were simultaneous and of equal duration, but differing spectra permitted unique identification of vowel components in the compound FFR. Horizontal and vertical montage FFRs were recorded with putative origins in the acoustic nerve and central brain stem, respectively. FFRs obtained during attention to each vowel showed significant effects for the voice fundamental frequency, f0, which is perceptually salient and conveys paralinguistic information such as the sex of the speaker. Amplitudes of f0 were larger when vowels were attended than when ignored. These findings provide evidence of short-latency attention effects in humans and suggest that linguistic attention may initially filter inputs based on salient paralinguistic cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9665621     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199806010-00041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  21 in total

1.  Biasing the brain's attentional set: II. effects of selective intersensory attentional deployments on subsequent sensory processing.

Authors:  John J Foxe; Gregory V Simpson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Evidence against attentional state modulating scalp-recorded auditory brainstem steady-state responses.

Authors:  Leonard Varghese; Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Processing Complex Sounds Passing through the Rostral Brainstem: The New Early Filter Model.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Tom A Campbell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Brainstem correlates of speech-in-noise perception in children.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Erika Skoe; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  Sensory-cognitive interaction in the neural encoding of speech in noise: a review.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Emotion and the auditory brainstem response to speech.

Authors:  Jade Q Wang; Trent Nicol; Erika Skoe; Mikko Sams; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 7.  Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Subcortical differentiation of stop consonants relates to reading and speech-in-noise perception.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Learning to encode timing: mechanisms of plasticity in the auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Thanos Tzounopoulos; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Analyzing the FFR: A tutorial for decoding the richness of auditory function.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.