Influence of correction of flow limitation on continuous positive airway pressure efficiency in sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome.

We evaluated the efficiency of two different treatment procedures with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on sleep, nocturnal breathing characteristics and daytime vigilance in 18 newly diagnosed patients with untreated sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome (SAHS) randomly allocated to two different groups. In group I, the positive pressure (PP) level was set to suppress flow limitation (PFL), while in group II the PP was set at a level that eliminated only apnoea/hypopnoea and snoring (PAHS). At the end of a 3 week period of home CPAP therapy, a follow-up sleep study, vigilance and cognitive tests were made. Overall, PFL was significantly higher than PAHS values (PFL: 10.42.6 cmH2O; PAHS: 8.9+/-2.6 cmH2O; p<0.01, mean+/-SD). We found no difference in sleep quality, nocturnal saturation and apnoea/hypopnoea index, or in daytime vigilance tests between the two groups at the end of the treatment period. However, there was a significantly greater scattering in the changes of sleep latency in group II than in group I. This was associated with a significant difference in the daily duration of nasal CPAP use between the two groups (group I: 7.29+/-0.95 h x day(-1); group II: 6.01+/-0.94 h x day(-1); p=0.01) and with a positive correlation between final maintenance of wakefulness test values and the duration of CPAP use (p<0.05; r=0.55). These results tend to show that correcting flow limitation is associated with a higher observance and a more important efficiency in normalizing daytime vigilance than with conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes