Literature DB >> 9647429

Costs and benefits of a community sobriety checkpoint program.

T R Miller1, M S Galbraith, B A Lawrence.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Alcohol-involved crashes cost society more than $100 billion a year. Sobriety checkpoints are effective in apprehending drunk drivers. This article compares the costs and the estimated monetary benefits from a hypothetical community sobriety checkpoint program.
METHOD: The analysis is constructed around a hypothetical community with 100,000 licensed drivers. A literature review suggests that a generously funded intensive checkpoint program (156 checkpoints per year) can be expected to reduce alcohol-attributable crashes by about 15%. The benefits (cost savings) of the checkpoint program are calculated using 1993 alcohol-involved crash incidence from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Costs per alcohol-involved crash and the percentage of alcohol-involved crashes attributable to alcohol are updated from published studies.
RESULTS: Estimated annual savings to the hypothetical community total $7.9 million. This includes $3.1 million for averted fatalities, $4.5 million for averted non-fatal injuries, and $0.3 million for averted property damage. Every $1 spent on a sobriety checkpoint program can be expected to save the community more than $6, including $1.30 of insurer costs.
CONCLUSIONS: An intensive sobriety checkpoint program can save a community more in automobile crash costs than the program costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9647429     DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1998.59.462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stud Alcohol        ISSN: 0096-882X


  7 in total

Review 1.  Prevention research and its actual application to health services.

Authors:  H D Holder
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Evaluation of four state impaired driving enforcement demonstration programs: Georgia, Tennessee, Pennsylvania and Louisiana.

Authors:  James C Fell; Elizabeth A Langston; A Scott Tippetts
Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med       Date:  2005

3.  Can progress in reducing alcohol-impaired driving fatalities be resumed? Results of a workshop sponsored by the Transportation Research Board, Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Transportation Committee (ANB50).

Authors:  James C Fell; Douglas J Beirness; Robert B Voas; Gordon S Smith; Brian Jonah; Jane Carlisle Maxwell; Jana Price; James Hedlund
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 1.491

4.  Sobriety Checkpoints and Alcohol-Involved Motor Vehicle Crashes at Different Temporal Scales.

Authors:  Christopher N Morrison; Jason Ferris; Douglas J Wiebe; Corinne Peek-Asa; Charles C Branas
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Evaluation of seven publicized enforcement demonstration programs to reduce impaired driving: Georgia, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Indiana, and Michigan.

Authors:  James C Fell; A Scott Tippetts; Marvin Levy
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2008-10

Review 6.  Preventing impaired driving opportunities and problems.

Authors:  Robert B Voas; James C Fell
Journal:  Alcohol Res Health       Date:  2011

7.  Alcohol-involved motor vehicle crashes and the size and duration of random breath testing checkpoints.

Authors:  Christopher N Morrison; Muhire Kwizera; Qixuan Chen; Cheneal Puljevic; Charles C Branas; Douglas J Wiebe; Corinne Peek-Asa; Kirsten M McGavin; Shellee J Franssen; Vy K Le; Michael Keating; Frances M Williams; Jason Ferris
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 3.928

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.