Literature DB >> 33616237

Alcohol-involved motor vehicle crashes and the size and duration of random breath testing checkpoints.

Christopher N Morrison1,2, Muhire Kwizera3, Qixuan Chen3, Cheneal Puljevic4, Charles C Branas1, Douglas J Wiebe5, Corinne Peek-Asa6, Kirsten M McGavin7, Shellee J Franssen7, Vy K Le7, Michael Keating7, Frances M Williams1, Jason Ferris4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sobriety checkpoints have strong empirical and theoretical support as an intervention to reduce alcohol-involved motor vehicle crashes. The purpose of this study was to examine whether checkpoint size (the number of police officers) and checkpoint duration (the amount of time in operation) affect associations between individual checkpoints and subsequent alcohol-related crash incidence.
METHOD: Queensland Police Service provided latitude-longitude coordinates and date and time data for all breath tests that occurred in Brisbane, Australia, from January 2012 to June 2018. We applied hierarchical cluster analysis to the latitude-longitude coordinates for breath tests, identifying checkpoints as clusters of ≥25 breath tests conducted by ≥3 breath testing devices over a duration of 3 to 8 hours. Generalized linear autoregressive moving average (GLARMA) models related counts of alcohol-involved motor vehicle crashes to the number of checkpoints conducted per week, as well as 1 week prior and 2 weeks prior.
RESULTS: A total of 3420 alcohol-related crashes occurred and 2069 checkpoints were conducted in Brisbane over the 6.5-year (339-week) study period. On average, checkpoints included a mean of 266.0 breath tests (SD = 216.3), 16.4 devices (SD = 13.7), and were 286.3 minutes in duration (SD = 104.2). Each 10 additional checkpoints were associated with a 12% decrease in crash incidence at a lag of 1 week (IRR = 0.88; 95%CI: 0.80, 0.97). We detected no differential associations according to checkpoint size or duration.
CONCLUSIONS: Sobriety checkpoints are associated with fewer alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes for around 1 week. Checkpoint size and duration do not appear to affect this relationship.
© 2021 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alcohol; checkpoint; crash; motor vehicle; police; sobriety

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33616237      PMCID: PMC8076098          DOI: 10.1111/acer.14583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.928


  15 in total

Review 1.  Sobriety checkpoints: evidence of effectiveness is strong, but use is limited.

Authors:  James C Fell; John H Lacey; Robert B Voas
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.491

2.  Low-manpower checkpoints: can they provide effective DUI enforcement in small communities?

Authors:  John H Lacey; Susan A Ferguson; Tara Kelley-Baker; Raamses P Rider
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.491

3.  Random breath testing in Queensland and Western Australia: examination of how the random breath testing rate influences alcohol related traffic crash rates.

Authors:  Jason Ferris; Lorraine Mazerolle; Mark King; Lyndel Bates; Sarah Bennett; Madonna Devaney
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2013-08-30

4.  The geography of deterrence: exploring the small area effects of sobriety checkpoints on alcohol-impaired collision rates within a city.

Authors:  Samuel Nunn; William Newby
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2011-04-25

5.  Publicized sobriety checkpoint programs to reduce alcohol-impaired driving: recommendation of the Community Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 6.  Publicized sobriety checkpoint programs: a community guide systematic review.

Authors:  Gwen Bergen; Adesola Pitan; Shuli Qu; Ruth A Shults; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; Randy W Elder; David A Sleet; Heidi L Coleman; Richard P Compton; James L Nichols; John M Clymer; William B Calvert
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 7.  Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving.

Authors:  R A Shults; R W Elder; D A Sleet; J L Nichols; M O Alao; V G Carande-Kulis; S Zaza; D M Sosin; R S Thompson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Sobriety Checkpoints and Alcohol-Involved Motor Vehicle Crashes at Different Temporal Scales.

Authors:  Christopher N Morrison; Jason Ferris; Douglas J Wiebe; Corinne Peek-Asa; Charles C Branas
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Perceptions and experiences of random breath testing in Queensland and the self-reported deterrent impact on drunk driving.

Authors:  Barry Watson; James Freeman
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.491

10.  Effects of a Community-Level Intervention on Alcohol-Related Motor Vehicle Crashes in California Cities: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Robert F Saltz; Mallie J Paschall; Sharon E O'Hara
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.