Literature DB >> 31005468

Sobriety Checkpoints and Alcohol-Involved Motor Vehicle Crashes at Different Temporal Scales.

Christopher N Morrison1, Jason Ferris2, Douglas J Wiebe3, Corinne Peek-Asa4, Charles C Branas5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Roadside sobriety checkpoints are an intervention in which law enforcement officers stop passing vehicles to check whether drivers are impaired. There is clear evidence that a program of roadside sobriety checkpoints is an effective approach to reducing alcohol-involved motor vehicle crashes, likely because of general deterrent effects across the entire population of drivers. The aim of this study is to assess the duration of time over which individual roadside sobriety checkpoints are associated with alcohol-involved motor vehicle crashes, within the context of a broader checkpoint program.
METHODS: In August 2018, the authors accessed incident-level data for alcohol-involved motor vehicle crashes and roadside sobriety checkpoints for the City of Los Angeles, California, 2013-2017. Counts of crashes and checkpoints were computed within three different temporal units: days (n=1,826), weeks (n=260), and months (n=60). The number of checkpoints were then calculated at different lagged periods (up to 7 days, up to 4 weeks, and up to 3 months). Autoregressive integrated moving average analyses related counts of checkpoints over these lagged periods to subsequent crashes.
RESULTS: Fewer alcohol-involved motor vehicle crashes occurred when there were more roadside sobriety checkpoints over the previous 4 days, 5 days, 6 days, 7 days, and 1 week.
CONCLUSIONS: Individual roadside sobriety checkpoints affected alcohol-involved motor vehicle crashes in Los Angeles, California for approximately 1 week. The temporal configuration of individual checkpoints is an important consideration when designing an overall roadside sobriety checkpoint program.
Copyright © 2019 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31005468      PMCID: PMC6557160          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  16 in total

1.  Motor-vehicle safety: a 20th century public health achievement.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1999-05-14       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 2.  Effects of minimum drinking age laws: review and analyses of the literature from 1960 to 2000.

Authors:  Alexander C Wagenaar; Traci L Toomey
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Suppl       Date:  2002-03

3.  Why are sobriety checkpoints not widely adopted as an enforcement strategy in the United States?

Authors:  James C Fell; Susan A Ferguson; Allan F Williams; Michele Fields
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2003-11

4.  Random breath testing in Queensland and Western Australia: examination of how the random breath testing rate influences alcohol related traffic crash rates.

Authors:  Jason Ferris; Lorraine Mazerolle; Mark King; Lyndel Bates; Sarah Bennett; Madonna Devaney
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2013-08-30

5.  Time series count data models: an empirical application to traffic accidents.

Authors:  Mohammed A Quddus
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2008-07-09

6.  The effects of drink-driving checkpoints on crashes--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alena Erke; Charles Goldenbeld; Truls Vaa
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2009-05-27

7.  The effect of drinking and driving interventions on alcohol-involved traffic crashes within a comprehensive community trial.

Authors:  R B Voas; H D Holder; P J Gruenewald
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Publicized sobriety checkpoint programs to reduce alcohol-impaired driving: recommendation of the Community Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 9.  Publicized sobriety checkpoint programs: a community guide systematic review.

Authors:  Gwen Bergen; Adesola Pitan; Shuli Qu; Ruth A Shults; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; Randy W Elder; David A Sleet; Heidi L Coleman; Richard P Compton; James L Nichols; John M Clymer; William B Calvert
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Perceptions and experiences of random breath testing in Queensland and the self-reported deterrent impact on drunk driving.

Authors:  Barry Watson; James Freeman
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.491

View more
  1 in total

1.  Alcohol-involved motor vehicle crashes and the size and duration of random breath testing checkpoints.

Authors:  Christopher N Morrison; Muhire Kwizera; Qixuan Chen; Cheneal Puljevic; Charles C Branas; Douglas J Wiebe; Corinne Peek-Asa; Kirsten M McGavin; Shellee J Franssen; Vy K Le; Michael Keating; Frances M Williams; Jason Ferris
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 3.928

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.