Literature DB >> 16179156

Evaluation of four state impaired driving enforcement demonstration programs: Georgia, Tennessee, Pennsylvania and Louisiana.

James C Fell1, Elizabeth A Langston, A Scott Tippetts.   

Abstract

This study provided a consolidated evaluation of four separate demonstration projects aimed at reducing impaired driving through well-publicized enforcement. Each of the four demonstration projects used different enforcement approaches in an effort to reduce impaired driving crashes in the State. Georgia experienced a significant decrease in drinking-and-driving fatal crashes (14 percent using a ratio measure in a time series analysis). The program in Georgia (2800 checkpoints) saved an estimated 60 lives in the first year. While Louisiana experienced a raw decrease in the ratio of drinking drivers to nondrinking drivers in fatal crashes, when the control parishes and the comparison States were taken into consideration, the apparent decrease was neutralized. Although Pennsylvania's selected counties showed relative decreases across a variety of measures when compared to control counties and surrounding States, these decreases were not significant. In Tennessee, the ratio measure showed a significant decrease (-10.6 percent) compared to surrounding States with an estimated 43 lives saved in the first year. In summary, it appears that if States use a sobriety checkpoint model that includes (a) a statewide effort, (b) numerous sobriety checkpoints conducted each weekend throughout the year, (c) intensive publicity about the enforcement, and (d) properly trained law enforcement officials, significant decreases in impaired driving fatalities can be realized.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16179156      PMCID: PMC3217456     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med        ISSN: 1540-0360


  6 in total

1.  The relationship of alcohol safety laws to drinking drivers in fatal crashes.

Authors:  R B Voas; A S Tippetts; J Fell
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2000-07

Review 2.  Sobriety checkpoints: evidence of effectiveness is strong, but use is limited.

Authors:  James C Fell; John H Lacey; Robert B Voas
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.491

3.  Traffic safety effects of sobriety checkpoints and other local DWI programs in New Jersey.

Authors:  D Levy; D Shea; P Asch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving.

Authors:  R A Shults; R W Elder; D A Sleet; J L Nichols; M O Alao; V G Carande-Kulis; S Zaza; D M Sosin; R S Thompson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Costs and benefits of a community sobriety checkpoint program.

Authors:  T R Miller; M S Galbraith; B A Lawrence
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1998-07

6.  The effect of random alcohol screening in reducing motor vehicle crash injuries.

Authors:  C Peek-Asa
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.043

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Effect of Maryland's 2011 Alcohol Sales Tax Increase on Alcohol-Positive Driving.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Lavoie; Patricia Langenberg; Andres Villaveces; Patricia C Dischinger; Linda Simoni-Wastila; Kathleen Hoke; Gordon S Smith
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Sobriety Checkpoints and Alcohol-Involved Motor Vehicle Crashes at Different Temporal Scales.

Authors:  Christopher N Morrison; Jason Ferris; Douglas J Wiebe; Corinne Peek-Asa; Charles C Branas
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 5.043

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.