Literature DB >> 21242330

A prospective assessment of racial/ethnic differences in future mammography behavior among women who had early mammography.

Julie M Kapp1, Rod Walker, Sebastien Haneuse, Bonnie C Yankaskas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Twenty-nine percent of women, aged 30 to 39, report having had a mammogram, though sensitivity and specificity are low. We investigate racial/ethnic differences in future mammography behavior among women who had a baseline screening mammogram prior to age 40.
METHODS: Using 1994-2008 data from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC), we identified 29,390 women aged 35 to 39 with a baseline screening mammogram. We followed this cohort for 2 outcomes: (i) future BCSC mammography between ages 40 and 45; and (2) among those, delay in screening mammography until ages 43 to 45 compared with ages 40 to 42. Using adjusted log-linear models, we estimated the relative risk (RR) of these outcomes by race/ethnicity, while also considering the impact of false-positive/true-negative (FP/TN) baseline mammography results on these outcomes.
RESULTS: Relative to non-Hispanic white women, Hispanic women had an increased risk of no future BCSC mammography (RR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.13-1.30); Asian women had a decreased risk (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.61-0.74). Women with a FP result, compared with a TN result, had a decreased risk of no future BCSC mammography (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.85-0.95). Among those with future BCSC screening mammography, African American women were more likely to delay the timing (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.09-1.45). The interaction between race/ethnicity and FP/TN baseline results was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Race/ethnicity is differentially associated with future BCSC mammography and the timing of screening mammography after age 40. IMPACT: These findings introduce the need for research that examines disparities in lifetime mammography use patterns from the initiation of mammography screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21242330      PMCID: PMC3070038          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  23 in total

1.  Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  American Cancer Society guidelines on screening for breast cancer. An overview.

Authors:  G D Dodd
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Racial/ethnic inequities in continuity and site of care: location, location, location.

Authors:  M P Doescher; B G Saver; K Fiscella; P Franks
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Are there racial/ethnic disparities among women younger than 40 undergoing mammography?

Authors:  Julie M Kapp; Rod Walker; Sebastien Haneuse; Diana S M Buist; Bonnie C Yankaskas
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database.

Authors:  R Ballard-Barbash; S H Taplin; B C Yankaskas; V L Ernster; R D Rosenberg; P A Carney; W E Barlow; B M Geller; K Kerlikowske; B K Edwards; C F Lynch; N Urban; C A Chrvala; C R Key; S P Poplack; J K Worden; L G Kessler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization.

Authors:  M L Burman; S H Taplin; D F Herta; J G Elmore
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: highlights of the 1996 report.

Authors:  P S Frame; A O Berg; S Woolf
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 3.292

8.  Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Trock; B K Rimer; A Boyce; C Jepson; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations on breast cancer screening.

Authors:  S H Woolf
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Screening behavior of women after a false-positive mammogram.

Authors:  E D Pisano; J Earp; M Schell; K Vokaty; A Denham
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  Healthcare Factors for Obtaining a Mammogram in Latinas With a Variable Mammography History.

Authors:  John R Scheel; Yamile Molina; Gloria Coronado; Sonia Bishop; Sarah Doty; Ricardo Jimenez; Beti Thompson; Constance D Lehman; Shirley A A Beresford
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.172

2.  Disparities in abnormal mammogram follow-up time for Asian women compared with non-Hispanic white women and between Asian ethnic groups.

Authors:  Kim H Nguyen; Rena J Pasick; Susan L Stewart; Karla Kerlikowske; Leah S Karliner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Racial/ethnic differences in breast cancer survival by inflammatory status and hormonal receptor status: an analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data.

Authors:  Jill K Schinkel; Shelia Hoar Zahm; Ismail Jatoi; Katherine A McGlynn; Christopher Gallagher; Catherine Schairer; Craig D Shriver; Kangmin Zhu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 2.506

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.