Literature DB >> 9644663

[Determining visual acuity using European normal values: scientific principles and possibilities for automatic measurement].

M Bach1, G Kommerell.   

Abstract

PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION: According to the European standard EN ISO 8596 the Landolt-C in 8 different orientations has to be used to measure visual acuity. With decreasing size of the Landolt-C the hit rate declines from 100% to the chance level of 12.5%. This gradual transition is described by the "psychometric function". The steepest point of the psychometric function is in the middle between 100 and 12.5, i.e., at 56.25%. This point of the psychometric function (approximated by 5 of 8 Landolt-Cs) has been selected as the threshold for visual acuity, because it is there that the visual acuity is influenced least by (incidental) fluctuations. The subject has to answer by forced choice; a response like "I cannot detect anything" is not acceptable. "NORMAL" VISUAL ACUITY: Cannot be assigned to a certain value, like 1.0 or 6/6. With the standard test procedure, visually healthy, young subjects achieve a visual acuity of about 2.0 or 12/6, while in senior subjects 0.5 (3/6) may be "normal". AVERAGING VISUAL ACUITY: Logarithmic, not arithmetic, scaling of visual acuity approximates the perceptual metric. Consequently, visual acuity values may not be averaged arithmetically. Instead, three steps are required: all values have to be converted to logarithms, then averaged, and finally the average can be reconverted. Geometric averaging is equivalent. "MINIMUM ANGLE OF RESOLUTION" NOT NECESSARY: MAR is the reciprocal of visual acuity. In many studies, clinical outcome has been assessed using log(MAR). Though statistically correct, this term is unnecessary, as log(acuity) has identical statistical properties. Furthermore, log(MAR) is contra-intuitive as its value becomes smaller when vision improves. COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUMENTATION: Facilitates complying with the EN ISO 8596. For instance, the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test relieves the examiner from observing whether 5 responses have been correct, and that not more than 8 tests are given per level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9644663     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1034863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd        ISSN: 0023-2165            Impact factor:   0.700


  25 in total

1.  Examination of young children with Lea symbols.

Authors:  R Becker; S Hübsch; M H Gräf; H Kaufmann
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  A 5-year follow-up study for distance visual acuity after low dose radiation on subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  C Valmaggia; G Ries; P Ballinari
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Reliability of a standardized reading chart system: variance component analysis, test-retest and inter-chart reliability.

Authors:  Eva Stifter; Franz König; Thomas Lang; Peter Bauer; Sibylla Richter-Müksch; Michaela Velikay-Parel; Wolfgang Radner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Visual acuity testing in diabetic subjects: the decimal progression chart versus the Freiburg visual acuity test.

Authors:  Lars Loumann Knudsen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Different effect of dioptric defocus vs. light scatter on the pattern electroretinogram (PERG).

Authors:  Michael Bach; Marcel Mathieu
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 6.  [Ophthalmologic reading charts : Part 2: Current logarithmically scaled reading charts].

Authors:  W Radner
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  [Ophthalmological assessment in procedures for disability benefits for the blind : Why medical certificates alone are insufficient].

Authors:  B von Livonius; H Pause; M Ulbig
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  [Fundamentals for the medical evaluation of handicapped people in legislation].

Authors:  K Rohrschneider; S Bültmann; I Mackensen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  A new specialized visual acuity chart for amblyopic children aged 3-5 years old: development and its clinical applications.

Authors:  Yang-Qing Huang; He Huang; Rong-Zhi Huang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  [Problems for ophthalmologists in the certification of blindness ].

Authors:  M Gräf; M Jomaa
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.