Literature DB >> 15104172

Different effect of dioptric defocus vs. light scatter on the pattern electroretinogram (PERG).

Michael Bach1, Marcel Mathieu.   

Abstract

To assess the quantitative effect of optical deficiencies on the Pattern Electroretinogram (PERG), we degraded the optical imaging onto the retina by dioptric defocus (+1.75-5 D), and by scatter transparencies. With optimal and degraded optics we measured the visual acuity and the steady-state PERG, evoked by checkerboards (check size 0.2-16 degrees), and flash stimuli. When the two optical degradation methods were equated for acuity, scatter transparencies reduced the PERG amplitude more than defocus. For scatter transparencies, there was a significant (p < 0.001) effect at 16 degrees, escalating for smaller checks. For defocus, significant effects were only observed for check sizes of 1.6 degrees and smaller. We explain the differences between the two blur techniques by their differing angular scattering functions. Dioptrical defocus leads to an underestimation of the effect of media opacities on the PERG. For the clinically relevant check size of 0.8 degrees, halving acuity reduces the amplitude by 15% with defocus and by 30% with scatter. With an acuity of 0.8 or higher, no clinically relevant effect of suboptimal refraction is seen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15104172     DOI: 10.1023/b:doop.0000018415.00285.56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  43 in total

1.  Standard for pattern electroretinography. International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision.

Authors:  M Bach; M Hawlina; G E Holder; M F Marmor; T Meigen; Y Miyake
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  VEP and PERG acuity in anesthetized young adult rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  J N Ver Hoeve; Y P Danilov; C B Kim; P D Spear
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  The effect of defocus on the contrast and phase of the retinal image of a sinusoidal grating.

Authors:  G Walsh; W N Charman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  The contrast characteristic of the pattern electroretinogram depends on temporal frequency.

Authors:  H R Zapf; M Bach
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Complementary components and local variations of the pattern electroretinogram.

Authors:  N Drasdo; D A Thompson; C M Thompson; L Edwards
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  The effect of refractive error on pattern electroretinograms in primates.

Authors:  M J Siegel; M S Marx; I Bodis-Wollner; S M Podos
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.424

7.  The pattern electroretinogram and visual-evoked potential in glaucoma.

Authors:  M J Price; S M Drance; M Price; M Schulzer; G R Douglas; B Tansley
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Human pattern-evoked electroretinogram.

Authors:  R F Hess; C L Baker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Detection of optic neuropathy in glaucomatous eyes with normal standard visual fields using a test battery of short-wavelength automated perimetry and pattern electroretinography.

Authors:  Andreas U Bayer; Klaus-Peter Maag; Carl Erb
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Improved electrode for electroretinography.

Authors:  W W Dawson; G L Trick; C A Litzkow
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  10 in total

1.  [Electrophysiological examination methods in glaucoma diagnostics].

Authors:  C M Poloschek; M Bach
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Effect of operator and optical defocus on the variability of pattern electroretinogram optimized for glaucoma detection (PERGLA).

Authors:  Gianmarco Vizzeri; Ali Tafreshi; Robert N Weinreb; Christopher Bowd
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Pattern electroretinogram to detect glaucoma: comparing the PERGLA and the PERG Ratio protocols.

Authors:  Michael Bach; Anke Ramharter-Sereinig
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  The relationship between stimulus intensity and response amplitude for the photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram.

Authors:  A M Binns; K E Mortlock; R V North
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Pattern electroretinogram and glaucoma.

Authors:  G van Lith; P Ringens; L J de Heer
Journal:  Dev Ophthalmol       Date:  1984

6.  Inter-subject, inter-ocular and inter-session repeatability of the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram recorded using DTL and skin electrodes.

Authors:  Katharine E Mortlock; Alison M Binns; Yousef H Aldebasi; Rachel V North
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 7.  Pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma.

Authors:  Lori M Ventura; Vittorio Porciatti
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.761

8.  Physiologic significance of steady-state pattern electroretinogram losses in glaucoma: clues from simulation of abnormalities in normal subjects.

Authors:  Vittorio Porciatti; Lori M Ventura
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Frequency doubling technology, optical coherence technology and pattern electroretinogram in ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Mauro Cellini; Pier Giorgio Toschi; Ernesto Strobbe; Nicole Balducci; Emilio C Campos
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  Combined Multi-Modal Assessment of Glaucomatous Damage With Electroretinography and Optical Coherence Tomography/Angiography.

Authors:  Khaldoon O Al-Nosairy; Gokulraj T Prabhakaran; Konstantinos Pappelis; Hagen Thieme; Michael B Hoffmann
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.283

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.