Literature DB >> 26586550

[Ophthalmologic reading charts : Part 2: Current logarithmically scaled reading charts].

W Radner1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze currently available reading charts regarding print size, logarithmic print size progression, and the background of test-item standardization.
METHODS: For the present study, the following logarithmically scaled reading charts were investigated using a measuring microscope (iNexis VMA 2520; Nikon, Tokyo): Eschenbach, Zeiss, OCULUS, MNREAD (Minnesota Near Reading Test), Colenbrander, and RADNER. Calculations were made according to EN-ISO 8596 and the International Research Council recommendations.
RESULTS: Modern reading charts and cards exhibit a logarithmic progression of print sizes. The RADNER reading charts comprise four different cards with standardized test items (sentence optotypes), a well-defined stop criterion, accurate letter sizes, and a high print quality. Numbers and Landolt rings are also given in the booklet. The OCULUS cards have currently been reissued according to recent standards and also exhibit a high print quality. In addition to letters, numbers, Landolt rings, and examples taken from a timetable and the telephone book, sheet music is also offered. The Colenbrander cards use short sentences of 44 characters, including spaces, and exhibit inaccuracy at smaller letter sizes, as do the MNREAD cards. The MNREAD cards use sentences of 60 characters, including spaces, and have a high print quality.
CONCLUSION: Modern reading charts show that international standards can be achieved with test items similar to optotypes, by using recent technology and developing new concepts of test-item standardization. Accurate print sizes, high print quality, and a logarithmic progression should become the minimum requirements for reading charts and reading cards in ophthalmology.

Keywords:  Near visual acuity; Ophthalmological diagnostic techniques; Reading; Vision tests; Visual acuity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26586550     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-015-0175-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  17 in total

1.  Reliability of a standardized reading chart system: variance component analysis, test-retest and inter-chart reliability.

Authors:  Eva Stifter; Franz König; Thomas Lang; Peter Bauer; Sibylla Richter-Müksch; Michaela Velikay-Parel; Wolfgang Radner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test.

Authors:  G E Legge; J A Ross; A Luebker; J M LaMay
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Reading performance of patients with uveitis-associated cystoid macular edema.

Authors:  Christopher G Kiss; Talin Barisani-Asenbauer; Saskia Maca; Sibylla Richter-Mueksch; Wolfgang Radner
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Reading performance of monofocal pseudophakic patients with and without glasses under normal and dim light conditions.

Authors:  Wolfgang Radner; Stephan Radner; Valerian Raunig; Gabriela Diendorfer
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Differences in reading performance of patients with Drusen maculopathy and subretinal fibrosis after CNV.

Authors:  Sibylla Richter-Mueksch; Michael Stur; Eva Stifter; Wolfgang Radner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  Visual requirements for reading.

Authors:  S G Whittaker; J Lovie-Kitchin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Subjective perception versus objective outcome after intravitreal ranibizumab for exudative AMD.

Authors:  Konrad R Koch; Philipp S Muether; Manuel M Hermann; Robert Hoerster; Bernd Kirchhof; Sascha Fauser
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Reading performance is reduced by parafoveal scotomas in patients with macular telangiectasia type 2.

Authors:  Robert P Finger; Peter Charbel Issa; Rolf Fimmers; Frank G Holz; Gary S Rubin; Hendrik P N Scholl
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  [Decreased reading speed and rapid fatigue as signs of disordered visual function].

Authors:  E Stangler-Zuschrott
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 0.700

10.  Psychophysics of reading--XIII. Predictors of magnifier-aided reading speed in low vision.

Authors:  S J Ahn; G E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  2 in total

1.  Introduction of a digital near-vision reading test for normal and low vision adults: development and validation.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Eirini-Kanella Panagiotopoulou; Eleftherios Chatzimichael; Maria Tzinava; Asimina Mataftsi; Konstantinos Delibasis
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2020-10-22

Review 2.  Reading charts in ophthalmology.

Authors:  W Radner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 3.117

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.