Literature DB >> 17505834

[Fundamentals for the medical evaluation of handicapped people in legislation].

K Rohrschneider1, S Bültmann, I Mackensen.   

Abstract

In claims from social law, evaluation by the treating physician is often mandatory. He is obliged to provide information at the request of the social insurance carrier. Ophthalmologists are required to independently and objectively assess medical conditions, apart from a routine visit, and pass the data on to the consultants at the pension office in a understandable way. Functional impairment must be explained on the basis of morphology, diagnosis and examination results so that it becomes impartially comprehensible. Basically, examination results must be presented according to the standards of medical evaluation, such as DIN 58220 visual acuity testing and visual fields analogous to manual-kinetic perimetry by Goldmann perimeter or approved comparable methods of visual field testing. Results that are not compliant with the official standards need to be identified accordingly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17505834     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-007-1536-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  11 in total

1.  [Correlation of letter optotypes with Landholt ring for different degrees of visual acuity].

Authors:  B Rassow; Y Wang
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 0.700

2.  [Objective evaluation of visual acuity].

Authors:  M Gräf
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  [The peripheral visual field].

Authors:  E Aulhorn; H Lüddeke
Journal:  Ber Zusammenkunft Dtsch Ophthalmol Ges       Date:  1977

4.  Visual acuities "hand motion" and "counting fingers" can be quantified with the freiburg visual acuity test.

Authors:  Kilian Schulze-Bonsel; Nicolas Feltgen; Hermann Burau; Lutz Hansen; Michael Bach
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  [Damage to visual capacity. Recommendations of the German Ophthalmologic Society and the Workmen's Compensation Group 1994].

Authors:  H E Völcker; B Gramberg-Danielsen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  [A new test (C-test) for quantitative examination of crowding with test results in amblyopic and ametropic patients (author's transl)].

Authors:  W Haase; A Hohmann
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 0.700

Review 7.  [Blindness in Germany--today and in 2030].

Authors:  C Knauer; N Pfeiffer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  [Visual field examination in limited patient cooperation].

Authors:  M Gräf
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 0.700

9.  [Determination of visual function in legal assessment].

Authors:  C Springer; S Bültmann; H Krastel; K Rohrschneider
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  [Errors and difficulties in the assessment of severely handicapped and blind persons].

Authors:  I Mackensen; S Becker; K Rohrschneider
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.059

View more
  7 in total

1.  [Functional diagnostic options for advanced and end stage glaucoma].

Authors:  A F Scheuerle; U Schiefer; K Rohrschneider
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Ophthalmological assessment in procedures for disability benefits for the blind : Why medical certificates alone are insufficient].

Authors:  B von Livonius; H Pause; M Ulbig
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  [Introduction to the topic: medial evaluation of severely handicapped and blind persons in legislation].

Authors:  K Rohrschneider
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  [Statement of the Committee for Transport and Traffic Ophthalmology of the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists Germany (BVA) and the German Society of Ophthalmology (DOG) : November 2018].

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 5.  Current methods of visual rehabilitation.

Authors:  Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-12-26       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  [Determination of visual function in legal assessment].

Authors:  C Springer; S Bültmann; H Krastel; K Rohrschneider
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  [Errors and difficulties in the assessment of severely handicapped and blind persons].

Authors:  I Mackensen; S Becker; K Rohrschneider
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.059

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.