Literature DB >> 9641318

Perceptual consequences of the interactions between spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and external tones. I. Monaural diplacusis and aftertones.

G Long1.   

Abstract

Research into monaural diplacusis has led to the concept of idiotones (tone-like stimuli of cochlea origin). Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) are tone-like stimuli generated by the cochlea and detected in the ear canal. In diplacusis, the existence of idiotones is inferred from disturbances of the perception of single tones. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are measured by placing a small microphone at the entrance to the ear canal. Many of the puzzling properties of the hypothesized idiotones are consistent with measurements of the interaction of SOAEs with external tones. The interactions of the SOAEs with external tones were analyzed acoustically. The perceptual properties evoked by 250 ms pulses (presented twice a second) of the acoustic stimuli used in the OAE experiments were systematically investigated. At some stimulus levels, all subjects reported the perception of a second tone alternating with the external tone. The relative pitch of this percept was consistent with the frequency of the SOAE. The frequency dependence of the signal levels needed for the percept had many aspects in common with the suppression tuning curves of the SOAEs. At lower levels of the external tone the subjects sometimes reported a perception of two simultaneous tones. This would be consistent with the subject detecting SOAEs when they are frequency shifted, but not suppressed. The consumption of aspirin by one subject reduced the SOAE into the noise floor and eliminated the monaural diplacusis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9641318     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(98)00032-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  7 in total

1.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: amplitude modulation.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Kelly L Watts
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

3.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions, threshold microstructure, and psychophysical tuning over a wide frequency range in humans.

Authors:  Rachael R Baiduc; Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold fine structure.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-23

5.  A common microstructure in behavioral hearing thresholds and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The influence of probe level on the tuning of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions and behavioral test in human.

Authors:  Yao Wang; Qin Gong; Tao Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Tinnitus in Normal-Hearing Participants after Exposure to Intense Low-Frequency Sound and in Ménière's Disease Patients.

Authors:  Margarete Anna Ueberfuhr; Lutz Wiegrebe; Eike Krause; Robert Gürkov; Markus Drexl
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.