Literature DB >> 25608301

A Device for Human Ultrasonic Echolocation.

Jascha Sohl-Dickstein1, Santani Teng2, Benjamin M Gaub3, Chris C Rodgers4, Crystal Li3, Michael R DeWeese3, Nicol S Harper5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We present a device that combines principles of ultrasonic echolocation and spatial hearing to provide human users with environmental cues that are 1) not otherwise available to the human auditory system, and 2) richer in object and spatial information than the more heavily processed sonar cues of other assistive devices. The device consists of a wearable headset with an ultrasonic emitter and stereo microphones with affixed artificial pinnae. The goal of this study is to describe the device and evaluate the utility of the echoic information it provides.
METHODS: The echoes of ultrasonic pulses were recorded and time stretched to lower their frequencies into the human auditory range, then played back to the user. We tested performance among naive and experienced sighted volunteers using a set of localization experiments, in which the locations of echo-reflective surfaces were judged using these time-stretched echoes.
RESULTS: Naive subjects were able to make laterality and distance judgments, suggesting that the echoes provide innately useful information without prior training. Naive subjects were generally unable to make elevation judgments from recorded echoes. However, trained subjects demonstrated an ability to judge elevation as well.
CONCLUSION: This suggests that the device can be used effectively to examine the environment and that the human auditory system can rapidly adapt to these artificial echolocation cues. SIGNIFICANCE: Interpreting and interacting with the external world constitutes a major challenge for persons who are blind or visually impaired. This device has the potential to aid blind people in interacting with their environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25608301      PMCID: PMC4536767          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2393371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  31 in total

Review 1.  Echolocation.

Authors:  Gareth Jones
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Echolocation versus echo suppression in humans.

Authors:  Ludwig Wallmeier; Nikodemus Geßele; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Adapting to supernormal auditory localization cues. I. Bias and resolution.

Authors:  B G Shinn-Cunningham; N I Durlach; R M Held
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Lateralization of large interaural delays.

Authors:  J E Mossop; J F Culling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans.

Authors:  B Röder; W Teder-Sälejärvi; A Sterr; F Rösler; S A Hillyard; H J Neville
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-07-08       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The role of the external ear in vertical sound localization in the free flying bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  Chen Chiu; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Human echo perception.

Authors:  C E Rice
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Parahippocampal cortex is involved in material processing via echoes in blind echolocation experts.

Authors:  Jennifer L Milne; Stephen R Arnott; Daniel Kish; Melvyn A Goodale; Lore Thaler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Human listeners provide insights into echo features used by dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) to discriminate among objects.

Authors:  Caroline M Delong; Whitlow W L Au; Heidi E Harley; Herbert L Roitblat; Lisa Pytka
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Neural correlates of motion processing through echolocation, source hearing, and vision in blind echolocation experts and sighted echolocation novices.

Authors:  L Thaler; J L Milne; S R Arnott; D Kish; M A Goodale
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Auditory distance perception in humans: a review of cues, development, neuronal bases, and effects of sensory loss.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Brian C J Moore; Pavel Zahorik; Silvia Cirstea; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Stereosonic vision: Exploring visual-to-auditory sensory substitution mappings in an immersive virtual reality navigation paradigm.

Authors:  Daniela Massiceti; Stephen Lloyd Hicks; Joram Jacob van Rheede
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Visual Echolocation Concept for the Colorophone Sensory Substitution Device Using Virtual Reality.

Authors:  Patrycja Bizoń-Angov; Dominik Osiński; Michał Wierzchoń; Jarosław Konieczny
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  A Systematic Review of Urban Navigation Systems for Visually Impaired People.

Authors:  Fatma El-Zahraa El-Taher; Ayman Taha; Jane Courtney; Susan Mckeever
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  People's Ability to Detect Objects Using Click-Based Echolocation: A Direct Comparison between Mouth-Clicks and Clicks Made by a Loudspeaker.

Authors:  Lore Thaler; Josefina Castillo-Serrano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Double-Diamond Model-Based Orientation Guidance in Wearable Human-Machine Navigation Systems for Blind and Visually Impaired People.

Authors:  Xiaochen Zhang; Hui Zhang; Linyue Zhang; Yi Zhu; Fei Hu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.